Search for: "United States v. Box" Results 1181 - 1200 of 2,325
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2014, 5:05 am by SHG
The United States Supreme Court stuck defendants in the middle of a mine field, and the California Supreme Court decided that the defendant deserved to be destroyed even if he never actually stepped on a mine. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:04 am
 Noriega said that the game portrayed him as a kidnapper, murderer and enemy of the state, and that it had damaged his reputation. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 6:53 am by Jani
This has been seen different in the United States, as under the Feist Publications v Rural Telephone Service decision (more on which can be found here) effort alone won't give a work protectability under copyright. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:40 am by Richard S. Zackin
In a recent case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Lupyan v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 8:49 am by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
” Next, it reviews the standards of “willfulness” as presented by the United States and taxpayer’s counsel, and as determined by the Court in the recent Miami, Florida case which was tried and decided by a jury in Miami, Florida in June, 2014, United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 3:30 pm by Wells Bennett
New York (state legislatures cannot set maximum hours in particular industries); and Korematsu v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Google doesn't want you to limit its ability to follow you around the internet http://t.co/9vYzPQjxcK -> RT @eurorights: 'French blogger owes $2,000 in damages for review 'too prominent' on Google'. http://t.co/UHMDvye7hC -> RT @thenetmonitor: Putin signs law that could end up blocking Facebook and Twitter in Russia http://t.co/gXCDBlKZps -> RT @PrivacyDigest: 26 Questions EU Regulators Want Google to Answer – Digits – WSJ http://t.co/wx2qjD1yBp ->… [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 3:55 am by Kevin LaCroix
United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:16 pm
First, as to the bad news: Boxed in by the United States Supreme Court's decisions on the enforceability of arbitration agreements, including in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:16 am by Siegel, LeWitter & Malkani
First, as to the bad news: Boxed in by the United States Supreme Court’s decisions on the enforceability of arbitration agreements, including in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:16 am by Siegel, LeWitter & Malkani
First, as to the bad news: Boxed in by the United States Supreme Court’s decisions on the enforceability of arbitration agreements, including in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:22 am by Patrick Maines
But several years before Citizens United, the Court largely nullified a major section of its McCain-Feingold decision when it ruled, in FEC v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:56 am
  * No More (Trade Mark) Trouble With Harry (Winston) Marie-Andrée recounts the melting tale of the Winston family, where Harry built up a worldwide famous jewellery company in 1932 which now tries to prevent his son Bruce from registering his own name and surname as a trade mark for jewellery with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 11:00 pm by Kingsley Egbuonu
RP16642 (relating to Electronic Collapsible Transparent Ballot Boxes) and Patent No. [read post]