Search for: "United States v. Classic"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,755
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption.” To be exempt from state taxation, the government must reserve some sort of controlling interest in a grant or privilege. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 10:49 am
As to what would or wouldn't undermine a privacy organization's resistance to invasive coronavirus surveillance, that is a classic question of opinion. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 3:09 am
In Glossip v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 4:51 pm
United States The ongoing debate in the United States over the implementation of net neutrality, following the Federal Communications Commission decision to repeal enforcement laws, continues following AT&T releasing a statement in support of legislative change. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 11:01 am
Supreme Court issued its decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 9:17 am
" Texas accomplished this unrepentant bit of business despite a 2002 decision of the United States Supreme Court styled Atkins v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm
United States The Federal Trade Commission voted to approve a fine of roughly [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm
United States, 249 U.S. 47, 52 (1919). [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 2:57 pm
Those young immigrants do not have legal status in the United States under current statutory law. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Powell v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:27 am
Kopf Senior United States District Judge (Nebraska) [i] For example, read the #LadyLawyerDiaries. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
But in about a dozen states, the laws remain on the books. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
BALLON - #141819 [email] HEATHER MEEKER - #172148 [email] GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP [email] [address] [phone] [fax] Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. ________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
” What a sumptuous feast of lies about the United States Constitution! [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
Update: As correctly noted by Mike Sachs, Chief Justice Roberts’ most significant betrayal to date was in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 11:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 8:36 am
In this Response, I argue that historical practice, McCulloch v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 11:00 am
As the Supreme Court noted in Campbell v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:58 pm
") Proceedings of the Bar and Officers of the Supreme Court of the United States in Memory of Benjamin Nathan Cardozo, November 26, 1938 (full text via the HathiTrust Digital Library) George S. [read post]
