Search for: "United States v. Gay"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,810
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2012, 6:06 pm
In Webster v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:43 am
MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom – 39401/04 [2012] ECHR 993 (12 June 2012). [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 12:34 pm
Smith v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:15 am
United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:26 am
In states where gay couples are allowed to marry, the costs for just about everything family-law related is higher. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:48 pm
United States, 10-cv-8435Read Entire NYLJ Article by Mark Hamblett here. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:00 am
She is beginning to investigate the gendered aspects of the policies that encourage home ownership in the United States, thinking about how our policy choices in the area of housing have the effect of favoring men over women (just as they tend to benefit the wealthy over the non-wealthy, and whites over non-whites). [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:07 am
United States, the challenge to Arizona’s S.B. 1070 immigration law. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 am
United States, 10-cv-8435. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:39 am
PDT *** RSVP to melissa@afer.org for access code San Francisco, CA – Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied a request from anti-marriage forces to reconsider its landmark ruling in Perry v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:39 am
PDT *** RSVP to melissa@afer.org for access code San Francisco, CA – Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied a request from anti-marriage forces to reconsider its landmark ruling in Perry v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:01 am
The dissenting opinion, from O'Scannlain, Bybee, and Bea said: A few weeks ago, subsequent to oral argument in this case, the President of the United States ignited a media firestorm by announcing that he supports same-sex marriage as a policy matter. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 9:05 am
Nor did the EEOC’s April ruling in Macy v Holder create a new protected class of transgender people, Feldblum said. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:11 am
In The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Julia Angwin and Jess Bravin report on arguments made by the government in a GPS tracking case in the Ninth Circuit in light of the Court’s decision earlier this year in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:51 pm
Mass. 2010) is an exciting step forward toward true marriage equality in the United States. [read post]
31 May 2012, 1:21 pm
This is the heart and soul of the decision: That premise is inconsistent with the reasoning underlying the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Lawrence v Texas (539 US 558 [2003]), in which the Court held that laws criminalizing homosexual conduct violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution (id. at 578). [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:46 am
National Protest on DOMA—Michael Lehet (Flickr.com) When some constitutionally suspect classifications (race, religion, alienage, or national origin) are not at issue, nor are any fundamental constitutional rights at stake, a law must be upheld if there is any “reasonably conceivable state of facts that could provide a rational basis for the classification” (United States Railroad Retirement Bd. v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 2:56 pm
United States, No. 4P10-cv-01565-CW (N.C. [read post]
27 May 2012, 9:07 am
Gay marriage Geraldine Morris on the Halsbury’s Law Exchange blog discusses the backtracking of the Government on this issue, and noted the incongruity in the legislation treating civil partners in the same way as married spouses upon the breakdown of their relationship (further to the judgment in Lawrence v Gallagher [2012] 1 FCR 557) but not at the commencement of their relationship. [read post]
