Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 9,474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2017, 5:04 am
Fourth Street, San Jose, CA 95113, in Dave Brock v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:55 am
” In today’s second case, United States v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 10:17 am
Yesterday, May 18th, the United States Supreme Court issued Ashcroft, Former Attorney General v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:20 am
Sociologist and expert on the states Mark Regnerus tried to revive this theory in recent years, particularly in the aftermath of United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
United States (07-513), on whether courts must suppress evidence seized during an arrest made as a result of faulty information provided by another law enforcement agency. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 4:30 am
" United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 11:51 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit released an opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 9:47 am
S.A.S. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 12:57 pm
The band attempted to register its name as a trademark but United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) refused the registration. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:07 am
Mwangi, Request for Advisory Opinion by the Pan African Lawyers Union (Palu) on the Compatibility of Vagrancy Laws with the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and Other Human Rights Instruments Applicable in Africa, No. 001/2018 Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International LawThe United States Recognizes the Human Right to a Clean, Healthy, and Sustainable EnvironmentSignatories of the U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:43 pm
See Tull v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:45 am
Advocacy organizations, scholars, and minority groups worried that these decisions opened the floodgates to the United States Patent and Trademark Office registering the vilest and most prejudicial terms in the U.S. lexicon, ossifying hatred. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 9:38 am
”) State of Ohio v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:04 am
The Court, however, applying the principles of construction established in Arnold v Britton, Wood v Capita and Rainy Sky, found that on a correct construction, the 1997 licence only licensed Ford’s US federal trade marks, and not any others. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 11:45 pm
" Likewise of no import were the facts that Mellbeck was not represented by an attorney, and had no prior experience in United States trademark matters. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 12:52 pm
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2024.html United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:44 am
Chanel established that it began using its mark in the United States in the 1930s, and the mark has consistently been ranked as one of the most recognized and famous brands in the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:33 am
California and United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 7:30 pm
Rather it was whether the Due Process Clause supported a claimed remedy of release into the United States. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:24 pm
" Petitioners -- the State of Texas; the Chamber of Commerce of the United States; and representatives of nationwide manufacturing, chemical and petroleum industries -- petition for review of the EPA's action under the Administrative Procedure Act. [read post]
