Search for: "United States v. Miller"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 2,411
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2024, 4:30 pm
On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment in all respects. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 3:42 am
In a podcast at Oral Argument, Joe Miller and Christian Turner discuss Armstrong v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:24 am
It should also be noted, when comparing how California treats restaurant workers compared to other states with a lower minimum wage and tip offset credits, California, and especially Los Angeles, has one of the highest costs of living in the United States. [read post]
17 May 2015, 9:04 am
Brown, with no Green, results in a colorful decision.United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:47 am
Oklahoma City University’s Michael O’Shea explains the history and multiple meanings of United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
That case involved the retroactivity of the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Tipton Eastern District of Kentucky at London 08a0400n.06 2008/07/02 United States Surety Company v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Tipton Eastern District of Kentucky at London 08a0400n.06 2008/07/02 United States Surety Company v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In Perry and United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm
(United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:12 am
Litzinger then called the First Assistant United States Attorney for North Dakota, who said that the VHS tapes were within the scope of the warrant. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Pretrial activities in United States v. al-Nashiri shifted focus Nov. 8 and 10, as the prosecution began presenting witnesses and physical evidence from the USS Cole for preadmission by presiding judge Col. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 2:00 pm
In IRAP v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 8:45 am
Lawrence v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 9:45 am
Thus, in Miller & Lux, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:36 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 2:46 am
Aultman-Miller Co., 169 U.S. 606 (1898): The only authority competent to set a patent aside, or to annul it, or to correct it for any reason whatever, is vested in the courts of the United States, and not in the department which issued the patent. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 11:57 am
The Fifth Circuit's recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
United States (seven). [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
