Search for: "United States v. Minnesota" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,827
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Michael Burleigh
CryoLife, Inc., the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ruled that Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Section 12(g)”) does not provide a private right of action. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 11:47 am by Howard Friedman
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, (3rd Cir., July 30, 2012), the 3rd Circuit affirmed a  Pennsylvania federal district court's opinion dismissing an inmate's complaint that he was denied access to plants, herbs, crystals, tarot cards, runes, spices, and an altar cloth in his cell to practice his Wiccan religion, and that he was not permitted to grow his hair or beard and was denied a religious adviser.In United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:26 am by Rick Hasen
Part II will analyze the constitutional issues raised by campaign finance regimes that include contribution limitations affecting recall elections, particularly in light of Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 1:00 am
Four members of a recognized tribe, The Lower Sioux Community, in the State of Minnesota (the "Tribe"), filed individual bankruptcy petitions (these individuals are referred to as "debtors" below). [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:53 pm by National Indian Law Library
Dept. of Interior (federal recognition)* State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmCases featured: Minnesota v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 7:31 am by Conor McEvily
” Writing for the online journal Defining Ideas, Richard Epstein critiques the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:58 am by Joe Kristan
United States; USDC-AZ No. 2:09-cv-01284 Prior coverage: IRS fighting demutualization holding in another venue IRS LOSES DEMUTUALIZATION ARGUMENT IN COURT OF CLAIMS Demutualization: what to do now? [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:51 am by Rick Hasen
Minnesota had asked the Supreme Court to hold its petition until the court decided United States v. [read post]