Search for: "United States v. Neighbors"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,498
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2011, 6:13 am
Therefore, the “next-door neighbor” and “great-aunt” cases will probably arise and be decided by the district and circuit courts (courts that do the vast majority of the judicial decision-making in the United States) over the next several years. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:24 am
The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld that principle under the United States Constitution....... [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:25 am
” The difference in economic freedom between New Zealand (82.3 on the Heritage scale) and the United States (77.8) is relatively small. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 2:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm
Cherry Valley Pass Acres and Neighbors, et al. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:45 pm
(United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 11:28 pm
he United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") justifies the Plant Protection Act ("PPA")(7 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 11:27 pm
he United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") justifies the Plant Protection Act ("PPA")(7 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 6:38 am
The case, brought to our attention by a loyal reader, is Sven Toorvald v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 12:43 pm
[Affan v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 3:02 pm
This is not surprising since there are approximately 180,000 mailboxes of this type located across the United States. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 7:29 am
Imagine little Joe v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:13 pm
Neighbors, 590 F.3d at 493; United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 10:14 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:53 pm
The court concluded: The Minnesota Constitution provides broader protections to property owners than does the United States Constitution when property is taken, damaged, or destroyed for a public or governmental use. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:33 am
@font-face { font-family: "Arial"; }@font-face { font-family: "Cambria"; }p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; }div.Section1 { page: Section1; } As I assume everyone knows, courts in the United States use the exclusionary rule to enforce the 4th Amendment. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 6:48 am
U.S. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:26 pm
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/10/29/10-99021o.pdf United State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 2:58 am
United States, 129 S. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 1:20 pm
GOVERNMENT’S ROLE Interestingly, Sanders himself made a compelling case for why United States courts should help this process along. [read post]
