Search for: "Walsh v Walsh" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,718
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2011, 2:44 pm by JT
Jun Suk Seo v Walsh, 2011 NY Slip Op 01619 (2d Dept. 2011) This is the big decision of the week as far as I am concerned. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 4:13 pm by Olivia
 In Walsh v Badger Catholic, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on September 1, 2010, that the University of Wisconsin at Madison had acted improperly by denying funding to Badger Catholic, a Roman Catholic student group. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 12:24 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Camreta v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
  On Wednesday, I discussed the possibility of the Supreme Court accepting jurisdiction in State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
In proceedings by prisoners subsequently heard in Scotland (Smith v Scott [2007] SC 345), Northern Ireland (R v Secretary of State ex parte Toner and Walsh [1997] NIQB 18) and in England and Wales (Chester v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWCA Civ 1439)  the relevant Secretary of State has expressly accepted that the ban on prisoner voting is incompatible with the ECHR. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 8:26 am by WSLL
Fox.Representing Appellees J.T. and Aimee Walsh: William L. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 5:04 am by Adam Chandler
At Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen explains why he thinks Cao v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:30 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Chichvarkin & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 91 (10 February 2011) Walsh v Singh [2011] EWCA Civ 80 (10 February 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Luton Borough Council & Nottingham City Council & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin) (11 February 2011) YZ & Ors, R. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 9:44 am by Lawrence Solum
This excision-based understanding of judicial review is supposedly traceable to Marbury v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:01 am
 Suppose that D is charged with violating XGSS in connection with V's death by drowning and successfully argues to the State X Supreme Court that XGSS violates the X Constitution. [read post]