Search for: "Young v. State of California"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,502
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2014, 4:38 am
Penney (No. 2:14-cv-02565) is a case held by the Central District of California. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 4:37 pm
Ernst & Young, LLP, 768 F. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 11:24 am
Young, 522 F.2d 234 (6th Cir. 1975) (same). [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 10:48 pm
Pension funds for California state employees, New York state employees, and New York City employees represented Cendant shareholders as lead plaintiffs. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:18 am
In addition to California, the other states with at least a few such prisoners are Delaware, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Virginia. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 4:36 pm
Phelps, and United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 4:30 am
Greaves v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 5:05 pm
Interestingly, evidence was submitted by the Claimant’s American lawyer stating his belief that a Norwich Pharmacal order may be enforced in California pursuant to the recently enacted Interstate and International Depositions and Discovery Act, Cal. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
-Frankfort v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
-Frankfort v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am
The biggest legal story of this coming week will be the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union – the Article 50 “Brexit” judgment. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm
California’s CCPA 2.0: Does the US Finally Have a Data Privacy Act? [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
Pastuszenski, Goodwin Procter LLP, on Tuesday, July 18, 2017 Tags: California, Class actions, Jurisdiction, New York, PSLRA, Securities Act, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits, SLUSA, State law, Supreme Court CalPERS v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court observed in the context of high school students in Tinker v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:23 am
09-1039), and Actavis, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
” The case of Martinez-Hidalgo v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 7:42 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:02 am
The court also positively cites the allegation that Mindgeek “make[s] it easy for users to find child pornography” based on various video descriptions, such as “less than 18,” “the best collection of young boys,” “underage,” “cp,” “no 18,” “young,” “middle school girls,” “middle schools,” and “middle student. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:00 am
Montgomery v. [read post]
