Search for: ""duty to warn"" Results 1201 - 1220 of 1,389
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2009, 12:18 pm
At issue - Bayer's duty to warn women about the potential side effects of taking this popular contraception. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 5:45 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
The plaintiff further alleged that the defendant had breached duties to warn and to safely operate its premises to protect spouses and family members of employees from coming into contact with chemical substances used at its facility, thereby causing the plaintiff to suffer secondary chemical exposure. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 3:09 am
On this point, tort law is clear: one has no duty to warn of a commonly known hazard. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:02 am by Brian Cuban
It is unclear how that translates into a duty to warn her of anything. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 6:24 am by Lauren Ellerman
Well, they can always file suit if you have breached an agreement and have no legal duty to warn you. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:14 pm
Saying no to a liberal California precedent on the question of whether medical providers have a duty to warn others of patients' potential for violence. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 7:11 am by Beck/Herrmann
To extend a duty to warn about a competing product would "stretch[] the concept of foreseeability too far. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 10:00 pm
The Supreme Court held that under the recreational use statute, the city, which erected barricades and put up warning signs near the sheer park cliffs, had no duty to warn or protect visitors from "a naturally occurring condition. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 5:22 pm by Bruce Nye
  In the published part of the decision, the court rules that if you didn't manufacture or distribute the component, you have no duty to warn, and there's no failure to warn strict liability. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 8:07 am
Other changes included: (1) a provision for punitive damages and attorney fees in certain circumstances; (2) an all-encompassing comparative responsibility standard; (3) changes in the rights of plaintiffs and defendants with respect to provision of workers' compensation and compensation payments; (4) change in duty to warn; and (5) change in the law of indemnity and contribution. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 9:33 am
Madison County asbestos cases top last year's total [Madison County Record] San Francisco court plans to create asbestos docket [Legal Newsline] Iowa Supreme Court holds there is no duty to warn for second hand asbestos exposure [VAN FOSSEN v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 5:00 am by Beck/Herrmann
Those courts have correctly held that brand name manufacturers do not have a legal duty to warn about the risks associated with their competitors' generic drugs. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
Detroit Tigers, Inc., Alyssa Maribel Benejam, a minor attending a Detroit Tigers game was injured when part of a player’s bat broke and hit her, crushing her fingers. [42] The incident occurred despite protective screens employed to safeguard against such events. [43] The parents brought a lawsuit on their daughter’s behalf, alleging that the stadium failed to   adequately provide warning about flying projectiles and that the stadium operator owed a… [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
The defendants sold this trailer to the most sophisticated purchaser in the world, the United States government, argued the defense, and there is no duty to warn someone about something they know about already. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 10:02 am
(September 25, 2009) ___Cal.App.4th ___ (BC352170), also from the Second District, and agreeing with Taylor: If you didn't manufacture or distribute the component, no duty to warn; If you didn't manufacture or distribute the component, no strict product liability for injuries caused by adding the component;  and If you didn't manufacture or distribute the component, no negligence liability for failure to warn, either. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 6:54 am
  The Court of Appeal for the First District affirmed, holding  that (1) because the pumps and valves were not themselves defective, the defendants had no duty to warn about the dangers of other products used with them;  and (2) because the pumps and valves were incorporated into the overall propulsion system of the ship, there was no liability under the "component parts doctrine," sometimes known as the "bulk supplier doctrine. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:50 am
Here, in defense of the failure to warn claim, the main product supplier asserted that it had no duty to warn because that duty was obviated by the employer’s own duty to warn its workers. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
The court found no legal duty for a manufacturer to "enforce" its warning. [read post]