Search for: "*stanley v. Stanley" Results 1201 - 1220 of 1,784
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2011, 7:51 am by Peter Rost
Senate, Governor of Indiana, Governor of Montana, Maryland Senate, Vermont Senate, New York City Council, Southern Medical Association, ESOMAR, NC Pharmacy Association, The Prescription Access Litigation Project, Minnesota Senior Federation, Danske Bank, Sveriges Riksdag, Sveriges Radio Sommar, Svenska Nyhetsbrev AB, Entreprenörsdagen, Stockholms Läns Landsting, Läkemedelskommittén i Jämtlands län, Gräv 08-Undersökande Journalister,… [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 11:16 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/281922.dis.doc.pdf Federal Law Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals: Stanley v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 8:20 am by jlep
Wheatley, Apologia for the Second Circuit’s Opinion in SEC v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 10:12 am by Sarah Riley Howard
In Estate of Stanley Luckow v Luckow, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s grant of a motion for reconsideration seeking to modify a spousal support order recommended before the supporting spouse died, but not adopted until afterward. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 11:49 am by Paul Levy
This latter particular reason for anonymity irks Fish, who argues that Justice Stevens went astray in his majority opinion in McIntyre v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 2:52 am by traceydennis
R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2975 (21 December 2010) Mount v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 2974 (21 December 2010) C v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 2971 (17 December 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Cordant Group Plc, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills & Anor [2010] EWHC 3442 (Admin) (30 December 2010) Bovis Homes Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2010] EWHC 3378 (Admin) (21… [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 11:49 am by Kevin Sheerin
In the Matter of Department of Correction v Stanley Saint-Phard In this disciplinary proceeding, pursuant to Article 75 of the Civil Service Law, Respondent, a Correction Officer, allegedly used impermissible force against an inmate by dispersing a chemical agent in the inmate’s face and also placed the inmate in a chokehold. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:08 am by SHG
In his New York Times column, Stanley Fish closes with this assertion: Perhaps the most amazing statement is made by Daniel J. [read post]