Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 1,882
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
Buxton LJ, with whom Latham and Longmore LJJ agreed, stated that:- “The width of the rights given to the media by A v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:30 am
Jones, [1980] AC 74). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Pierre v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
In form 1001E it kept the pre-checked box at 6-1 that states that all European Patent Convention (EPC) contract states are designated. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:24 am
The Supreme Court Justices made the most of this opportunity by restating the law on penalties and thereby creating a new leading authority for this doctrine, to replace the early 20th Century authority of Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Company v New Garage and Motor Company [1915] AC 79. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 1:44 pm
The Government published a regulation on November 7, 2012 that stated that “Memory cards in microSD form factor, including microSD, microSDHC and microSDXC cards, are excluded from the definition “audio recording medium” in section 79 of the Copyright Act. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Furthermore, the complaint named seven relief defendants who received funds from the fraudulent operation for which they had no lawful entitlement (CFTC v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
The case, EEOC v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 10:57 am
United States, a recent decision of the Court of International Trade. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 10:55 am
(ii) Summary judgment against Illumina on the basis of issue estoppel The defendants’ application to enter summary judgment in respect of the new claim was brought on the basis of issue estoppel; namely, that it had already been decided that Illumina did not have standing to sue as it was not an exclusive licensee under the patents being enforced and that it should not be entitled to reopen this question.Carr J explained the law on issue estoppel by reference to Keith LJ’s judgment… [read post]
31 May 2015, 3:47 am
As Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead said in Sempra Metals v IRC [2007] UKHL 34; [2008] 1 AC 561 at [51]: "Legal rules which are not soundly based resemble proverbial bad pennies: they turn up again and again. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:55 am
A similar view was reached by the Divisional Court in R (P) v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] 1 WLR 2009 and by Blake J in R (G) v Chief Constable of Surrey Police [2016] 4 WLR 94. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:38 pm
Ltd 1894 AC 8. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:54 pm
ACE USA (067640) 3. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 4:31 am
” At ACS Blog, Bidish Sarma focuses on the cert petition in one of the cases, Karsjens v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 4:19 am
No. 03:11-633-AC (Jan. 11, 2012). [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 12:32 am
" The court quoted the 10th Circuit opinion in Pirraglia v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 6:54 am
" (Bonz Group (Pty) Ltd v Cooke [1994] 3 N.Z.L.R. 216). [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 9:29 am
See e.g., Baraukas v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:50 pm
United States Fish and Wildlife, et al., Case No. 08-CV-01490-AWI-GSA). [read post]
