Search for: "Akins v. State"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 2,814
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2014, 4:30 am
That doctrine comes into play when: (1) the federal plaintiff lost in state court; (2) the plaintiff complains of some injury from the state court judgment; (3) the state court judgment antedated the filing of the federal case; and (4) the plaintiff is inviting the federal court to reject the state court judgment. The plaintiffs appealed that decision to the Third Circuit, and that’s where we are today: Johnson v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:30 pm
In these circumstances, the contractor’s claim to those funds appears more akin to a resulting trust than ownership. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 10:56 am
Matarasso, 56 NY2d at 267; State Farm v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 7:15 am
[Disclosure: Howe & Russell and Akin Gump are counsel to the mother in this case.] [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:00 am
Culliver (09-158) - originally Conference 11.6 [involves lawyers from Akin Gump and Howe & Russell] United States Defense Department v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
As we stated in part I, the firms that had blogs tended to fall into two camps: Blog-Proud: These firms actually make it very easy to find their attorney's blogs. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:56 pm
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P., 105 S.W.3d 244, 250 (Tex. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 7:51 am
The leading Supreme Court decision is Burson v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 1:14 am
For example, in Herbai v Hungary the Strasbourg Court held that the state had a positive obligation under Article 10 to secure an employee’s right of freedom of expression as against their private sector employer. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:30 am
[Akin Gump and Howe & Russell also represented the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Stec v United Kingdom (2005) 41 EHRR SE295 and Loiseau v France application no 46809/99, 18 November 2003 appear to contain suggestions that a civil right is an 'assetable right' akin to a 'private right arguably recognised under domestic law' or 'an individual right of which the applicant may consider himself the holder'. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Stec v United Kingdom (2005) 41 EHRR SE295 and Loiseau v France application no 46809/99, 18 November 2003 appear to contain suggestions that a civil right is an 'assetable right' akin to a 'private right arguably recognised under domestic law' or 'an individual right of which the applicant may consider himself the holder'. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 5:58 am
” Dissent, State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 9:15 am
2022cv1564-24 [9] Feist Publications, Inc., v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 6:02 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:08 am
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reports that the State of Washington filed its brief yesterday in Doe #1 v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:45 am
Robinson v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:13 pm
[Akin Gump represents the petitioner in 08-1461.] [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 8:25 am
State v. [read post]
