Search for: "Apple v. State" Results 1201 - 1220 of 4,008
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Apple Surprise Optis v Apple (FRAND) [2023] EWHC 1095 concerned how much Apple was to pay for the global licence to Optis. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:09 pm
Joey Heape, Director of Media & Tech for the South Carolina Bar wrote the following commentary about the  "Mac v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Any order requiring any sort of journalistic material to be handed over to the state engages the right to freedom of expression of publishers and broadcasters under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and will amount to an interference for the purposes of Article 10 (see eg Handyside v United Kingdom and Tillack v Belgium). [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 7:59 am
This was because the application form for the Community plant variety right stated that the Cripps Pink apple trees were first marketed within the European Union (in France) in 1994 and first marketed outside the European Union (in Australia) in 1988. [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 1:58 am by INFORRM
Apple is to remove its highest level of data protection from customers in the UK following a government demand for access to user data. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 8:00 am
Update: Here is the full Court of Appeals decision in Kelly v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 7:33 am by Ronald Mann
Apple) and December (Life Technologies Corp. v Promega Corp.) sessions, the justices heard cases that involved rules for multi-component products. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 12:05 pm by Torsten M. Kracht and Rachel E. Mossman
As the commercial use of biometric identifiers becomes more commonplace (for example, the iPhone’s fingerprint authentication for Apple Pay), retailers should be mindful of the developments in state legislation that regulate commercial use and storage of biometric data, as the regulatory landscape is rapidly evolving and is inconsistent from state to state. [read post]
[2] See Senators Wiener & Stern Respond to Governor Pausing Funding To Implement Landmark Climate Laws | Senator Scott Wiener (ca.gov) [3] Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm by Florian Mueller
In U.S. federal court, it's not impossible but certainly rather difficult to satisfy the eBay v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 2:22 pm by Jack Goldsmith
Below Gabor Rona has a sharp response to my earlier post on Charlie Savage’s story on the latest round of Johnson v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:10 am by Florian Mueller
Not long after I finished reading, I felt eerily reminded of another antitrust complaint involving games, platforms (iOS), and even the subscription model (Apple Arcade): Pistacchio v. [read post]