Search for: "Ball v. State" Results 1201 - 1220 of 2,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2008, 4:48 pm
"We are attacking everything about the case, which includes the state's version of the facts and the evaluation if death is the appropriate penalty. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 9:29 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
But keep your eye on the ball because the California Supreme Court will be making the final call on the de minimis doctrine and whether or how it applies in the state. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 9:29 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
But keep your eye on the ball because the California Supreme Court will be making the final call on the de minimis doctrine and whether or how it applies in the state. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 4:12 am
The Stanford Law Review has an interesting series of articles on privacy in its most recent edition: A Reasonableness Approach to Searches After the Jones GPS Tracking Case by Peter Swire In the oral argument this fall in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 9:59 am
Wearing a cape and paint-ball mask, Freund went back to his house and took his own life. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:51 am by Bona Law PC
In a surprising turn of events, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed with the League and reversed the trial court, ordering that the injunction should issue—Philadelphia Ball Club, Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 5:02 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Ball State Accessing Ex-girlfriend’s MySpace Account and Posting Offensive Content Results in Conviction Ex-Employer’s Hijacking of a LinkedIn Account Is a Publicity Rights Violation–Eagle v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 6:28 pm
EvidenceProf Blog has a post about the use of Static-99 in a case before the 7th Circuit (link corrected thanks to Jim in the comments):The Seventh Circuit was recently presented with STATIC-99 evidence in the case, United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:32 pm
  Athough I have significant reservations about the conclusions, this clearly moves the ball forward. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 4:16 am by SHG
  He supports his position by pointing to  the odds of winning, together with the egregious decision in People v. [read post]