Search for: "Barnes v State"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 1,887
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2015, 9:02 am
<> Pebble LP v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
Barnes & Noble, Inc., et al., No. 15-1161 (abstract idea eligibility) [CloudSatchelPetition] Limelight Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
Kwass v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 1:21 pm
Rather, as the Colorado Court of Appeals clarified in Barnes v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:54 pm
The Court of Appeals reversed in State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 1:33 pm
App. 2010); State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
First up is Wittman v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 3:20 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 2:16 am
The suit states that the first two episodes "introduce a traveling carnival virtually identical to that in [Barnes']s original, copyrighted works" including the replication of Jamaican Vodoo witchdoctors. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 3:48 am
Sharon Barnes and Tim Barnes, Plaintiffs-Appelles, v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:13 am
R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 March 2014. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 4:24 am
” At National Review, Carrie Severino calls Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 1:34 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 1:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 1:22 pm
Like the court in GRK, Customs and Border Protection looked back to an old case call United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:09 am
Here’s more from SCOTUSBlog and The Post’s Robert Barnes. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 4:38 am
” At Courthouse News Service, Barbara Leonard looks at Murphy v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:58 am
At the Wall Street Journal Law Blog, Chelsea Phipps discusses the prospect that the government may have a more difficult time regulating false or misleading commercial speech in the wake of United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 3:32 am
Additional coverage of the order in the Texas case comes from Robert Barnes in The Washington Post, who notes that “Chief Justice John G. [read post]
