Search for: "Britain v. Britain"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 1,618
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2011, 12:04 am
Supreme Court issued its judgment in Missouri v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:19 am
Courtesy of Legal Blogwatch, we’re directed to the recent opinion in US v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:08 pm
V. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
KISSINGER Secretary of State EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND The Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; Desiring to make provision for the reciprocal extradition of offenders; Have agreed as follows: ARTICLE I Each Contracting Party undertakes to extradite to the other, in the… [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
CA.122/89, in which Great Britain's High Court of Justice concluded that there is no real distinction between "ordinary residence" and "habitual residence. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
KISSINGER Secretary of State EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND The Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; Desiring to make provision for the reciprocal extradition of offenders; Have agreed as follows: ARTICLE I Each Contracting Party undertakes to extradite to the other, in the… [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 12:04 am
Its judgment on the merits in Corfu Channel (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
KISSINGER Secretary of State EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND The Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; Desiring to make provision for the reciprocal extradition of offenders; Have agreed as follows: ARTICLE I Each Contracting Party undertakes to extradite to the other, in the… [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:15 pm
Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Libel Cases The Court of Appeal for Ontario has released Paulsson v.... [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Neither of the Contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own nationals under this Treaty but the executive authority of each Contracting Party shall have the power to deliver them up if, in its discretion, it considers that it is proper to do so. (2) For the purposes of this Article - (a) a reference to the executive authority of a Contracting Party shall, in the case of Australia, be construed as a reference to the Attorney-General of Australia; (b) Australian… [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 12:43 pm
The Bribery Act applies to any organization that “carries on a business” in Britain, meaning that it could have wide application, although the guidance on this point is not clear. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm
Tugendhat J forbade anyone in Britain from identifying “Mr Z”, who claims to have been defamed by his relatives in a row over a multimillion pound family trust. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm
KISSINGER Secretary of State EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND The Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; Desiring to make provision for the reciprocal extradition of offenders; Have agreed as follows: ARTICLE I Each Contracting Party undertakes to extradite to the other, in the… [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:51 am
Regina (Save Britain’s Heritage) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another [2011] EWCA Civ 334; [2011] WLR (D) 107 “Demolition works were capable of constituting a project for the purposes of article 1(2) of Council Directive 85/337/EEC on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:59 am
Arizona and the 2004 Supreme Court ruling in Schriro v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:20 am
It is expedient for President Obama to subjugate our national interests to those of France, Britain and NATO (to say nothing of the UN). [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:45 am
There is no analogy to be drawn with Mayor of London v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:21 pm
The case of Patmainiece v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions was reported in an earlier post. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 4:32 pm
Bruce V. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:51 pm
On Constitutional Interpretation: Originalism v. [read post]
