Search for: "Clark v. United States" Results 1201 - 1220 of 1,489
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2010, 9:30 am by The Greatest American Lawyer
  As we try and flush out some of the issues involved in this effort by the ABA, recall that a lawyer’s right to engage in commercial free speech and the community’s right to have that information available to them, is established in the United States Supreme Court a case of Bates v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:54 am by Melina Padron
G. v the United Kingdom – 37334/08 [2011] ECHR 1308 (30 August 2011) ??? [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 9:05 pm by Zoe Stern
A state judge overturned Georgia’s ban on abortion after six weeks of pregnancy, ruling that it violated Roe v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
United States The Atlantic had a piece “The True Danger of the Trump Campaign’s Defamation Lawsuits”. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:21 am
The Georgia cerebral palsy resource guide was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 9:47 am by Steve Hall
" The ruling also implied that the state's reticence left defendant Landrigan unable to meet his burden under the Supreme Court's 2008 decision in Baze v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
United States The US Copyright Office has rejected an attempt to register copyright in an image generated by AI tools. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 10:15 am by bndmorris
Ramirez’s article Adaption to Future Water Shortages in the United States is Caused by Population Growth and Climate Change is cited in the following article: Edward J. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian and BBC also report a demonstration at the Osbourne-Rogers wedding which Just Stop Oil has stated was not organised by them. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am by Melina Padron
  Iorworth HOARE v the United Kingdom – 16261/08 [2011] ECHR 722 (12 April 2011)  Convicted sex offender and lottery winner loses Euro human rights appeal against post limitation date. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]