Search for: "Company Doe v. Public Citizen"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 2,017
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Plaintiff James Dean, Inc. filed a trademark complaint against Twitter, as well as the fictitious persons, John Doe Defendants 1-5 Company, in an Indiana state court. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Doe and Doe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Doe and Doe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Doe and Doe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 12:34 am
In the famous case of New York Times Company v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:07 am
Pusateri v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
The Supreme Court denied the Bivens claim primarily on a no-entity-liability theory (foreshadowed in the public context by FDIC v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 8:28 am
Jack flagged an intriguing analysis, by Bruce Schneier, of the public-versus-private-storage of metadata question. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:34 pm
Burrage v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
The Court has held, for example, that corporations have free speech rights . . . not because corporations have “ideas” or a fundamental right to express themselves, but largely because of the value of corporate speech to listeners: the worth of speech, the Court explained in Citizens United and other cases, does not depend upon the identity of its source, whether corporation, association, union, or individual; and therefore a limit on corporate speech… [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
In Gertz v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am
Cobb, 13-138; Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:08 am
[Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 7:11 pm
“History shows that when government is engaged in surveillance, it can undermine public trust, and in that sense render its own citizens insecure. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 7:04 am
On the other hand, an employee may state a common law claim for retaliatory discharge if the employer discharges the employee for reporting to someone within the company a federal law violation if the federal law at issue furthers the general welfare of Illinois citizens. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 5:47 am
In State of New Jersey v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:28 am
The advocacy group Public Citizen has criticized the idea that damage caps are necessary to control costs. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 7:17 am
Moreover, Sec. 14 could have a dramatic impact on public policy in California as well as a direct impact on countless citizens of that state, both as employers and employees. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 6:01 am
All too often, we see private vendors and government entities conspire with each other to charge public citizens a second time for services the government has already been paid to do.] [read post]
