Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 1201 - 1220 of 16,690
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2023, 7:14 am by Alan J. Arville
However, such prescribing activities would be limited under the new rules to non-narcotic Schedule III-V controlled substances, a limitation not expressly included in the special registration provisions of the Ryan Haight Act. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  If this seems too bleak a view of the Court, consider that this is exactly what the Court did in Vega v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 6:51 pm by Haley Proctor
EPA, EPA’s Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Update was back before the Court following a remand and revision. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:59 pm
    This morning, the Supreme Court denied certiorari in Shields v. [read post]
Disrupt & Dismantle Threat Actors Pillar 2 discussed the commitment to use “all instruments of national power to disrupt and dismantle threat actors whose actions threaten our interests,” focusing on heading off “sustained cyber-enabled campaigns that would threaten the national security or public safety of the United States. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:07 am by Peter Mahler
” Recent Maryland Case Offers Guidance Filling the void, along comes a recent decision by the Appellate Court of Maryland — that state’s intermediate appellate court — in Mekhaya v Eastland Food Corp. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:38 am by SHG
It is extremely difficult to square the state bar’s version with what the prosecutor said, as recounted in Miller v Pate. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:20 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 9:39 am by HRWatchdog
Generally speaking, the vehicles must transport goods across state lines, or transport goods that have crossed state lines, and the vehicles must have a gross weight in excess of 10,001 pounds. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 8:00 am by Erin Sutton
Exceptions to the DEA in-person requirement would exist where a prescriber is covering for another practitioner who has conducted an in-person examination of the patient within the previous two (2) years (i.e., a cross-coverage situation), or where the prescriber is engaged in the “practice of telemedicine,” as that term is narrowly defined by 21 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:41 am by Cristina Mariottini
A cross-border element is almost invariably present in these proceedings, as they often involve persons from different countries and/or relate to facts which occurred in different States. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by INFORRM
United States On 21 February 2023, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:34 am by Peter J. Sluka
According to the Second Department, therefore, Section 608 gives the estate of a deceased member standing to pursue a dissolution claim, despite the language in Section 702 stating that only a member can petition for dissolution. [read post]