Search for: "Customer's Bank"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 15,146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2014, 5:38 pm
At issue in the case is whether Target should be held responsible for the costs incurred by the issuer banks as a result of fraudulent charges and to replace customers’ credit and debit cards. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 5:38 pm
At issue in the case is whether Target should be held responsible for the costs incurred by the issuer banks as a result of fraudulent charges and to replace customers’ credit and debit cards. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:14 am
What makes a company treat you like a customer, and not the product? [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:48 pm
Wyatt is accused of tapping Citibank's computers for customer information, then using it to set up checking accounts online with competing banks, including Bank of America, Washington Mutual and AmTrust. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 12:12 pm
Communication of personal data within a group of banks Banks will be able to transfer customers' personal data to other banks of the same group only with the prior consent of the relevant customers, unless one of the data protection exceptions apply (e.g. the communication in necessary to perform an agreement with the data subject). 2. [read post]
3 May 2011, 11:04 pm
Nor are they reaching out to their customers to work out individual solutions to their problems to keep them in their homes. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 7:30 am
For one thing, the full name of the victimized customer was disclosed online -- for all to see -- for about two years! [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 1:17 pm
Zambreno A Michigan court has ruled against Comerica Bank and in favor of the bank’s customer, Experi-Metal, Inc., holding that the bank should have prevented fraudulent wire transfers from the customer’s account that totaled more than $1.9 million in wire transfer payment orders. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:35 pm
Buried in the fine print of every customer’s contract, these clauses pre-emptively block consumers from going to court if the bank does something wrong. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 8:01 am
Yet banks in Chicago and all over the country are charging Americans hundreds of dollars per year just for the privilege of being customers, according to Chicago bankruptcy attorneys. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 12:15 pm
The federal court therefore ruled that the National Bank Act gives national banks the power to charge customers the fees underlying the class action claims against the National Banks. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
The payday lenders include Advance America, Cash America and ACE Cash Express, which allow customers to borrow against future paychecks, and which charge an average interest rate of 455 percent on top of fees of $15-18 per $100 loaned. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 3:23 am
This guides signatory banks’ transparency on their progress in implementing the Principles. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 11:52 pm
Thomson Reuters | July 2011; A federal judge overseeing nationwide bank overdraft fee litigation granted class-action status to UnionBanCal customers, the first certification in a case targeting more than two dozen lenders, a law firm for the customers said. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 9:22 am
The bank may have to pay millions of pounds to customers in PPI refunds. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 4:36 pm
” It is pretty pathetic when a bank charges a customer $35.00 for an overdraft of $1.00. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 12:59 pm
The Supreme Court of Indiana recently reversed and remanded a trial court’s order compelling arbitration of two bank customers’ putative class action complaint. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 11:17 am
According to the lawsuit, BNYM told its customers that its Standing Instruction FX program was an automated service that BNYM used to obtain the best FX rates for its customers. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 5:25 pm
Likewise, it appears that Bank of America is making no commitment to larger corporate and institutional customers, and larger charitable entity customers who have more than $25 million on deposit. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:44 am
Patrick McHenry (R-NC), the Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, and Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo) have now reached out to the prudential regulators asking them to take action to clarify that SAB 121 is not enforceable in light of the GAO decision.SAB 121, as issued, requires banks holding crypto assets to recognize a liability and a corresponding offset on their balance sheets, measured at the fair value of the customer custodial digital assets. [read post]
