Search for: "DANIEL v. DANIEL"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 8,749
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Despite receiving two interim probationary reports that indicated her performance was satisfactory during the course of her employment, on April 3, 2018, petitioner was called to a meeting with respondent Daniel Crandell, DPW's Commissioner, at which she was terminated after being told that she was "just not a good fit. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Despite receiving two interim probationary reports that indicated her performance was satisfactory during the course of her employment, on April 3, 2018, petitioner was called to a meeting with respondent Daniel Crandell, DPW's Commissioner, at which she was terminated after being told that she was "just not a good fit. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 6:42 am
’ ” Blondin II, 189 F.3d at 246 (quoting Friedrich v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 6:06 am
, on Friday, November 26, 2021 Tags: Board performance, Boards of Directors, Cybersecurity, ESG, Management, Surveys Sustainability and Investing Lessons Learned in the Pandemic Era Posted by Daniel C. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
A Witness Can Change Their Testimony on an Errata Sheet After a DepositionBy Daniel E. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 3:22 pm
At its core, the case, Becerra v. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 6:24 pm
Others Following on its earlier report, Foss Patent provided an update on the Epic Games v Apple injunction. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 7:19 am
Twitter Another Must-Carry Lawsuit Against YouTube Fails–Daniels v Alphabet Newspaper Isn’t State Actor–Plotkin v. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 5:00 am
In the case of Green v. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 5:00 am
Jackson and U.S. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 10:33 am
Twitter Another Must-Carry Lawsuit Against YouTube Fails–Daniels v Alphabet Newspaper Isn’t State Actor–Plotkin v. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 5:54 am
From Burch v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 5:00 am
In the case of Frazer v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 4:34 am
” White v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 9:36 pm
The 2017 Supreme Court decision in Trump v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 9:05 pm
Circuit in Garcia v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 8:31 am
A fifth requirement that is is sometimes added is that “[a] declaration will only be granted if it will have practical utility, that is, if it will settle a ‘live controversy’ between the parties”: Daniels v Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development), 2016 SCC 12 at para 11. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
Their arguments (which anticipated those made in Brown v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 5:58 am
Their arguments (which anticipated those made in Brown v. [read post]
