Search for: "David A. Kennedy" Results 1201 - 1220 of 2,861
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2012, 9:22 am by Steve Hall
” "Supreme Court expands defendant's rights in plea deals," is David G. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 12:30 pm by David Bernstein
As Justice Kennedy noted in his majority opinion, “when Congress has passed a statute and a President has signed it, it poses grave challenges to the separation of powers for the Executive at a particular moment to be able to nullify Congress’ enactment solely on its own initiative and without any determination from the Court [by refusing to defend it in court.] [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
For example, some folks are hoping that the Court (in particular Justice Kennedy) will find a way in the Wisconsin districting case argued in October—Gill v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 7:39 am
This week's New Yorker has a article on efforts there to implement the "Ceasefire" strategy with help from John Jay professor David Kennedy. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
David Boyle weighs in on the court’s first opinion in the travel-ban case at Casetext. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 5:07 am by Amy Howe
” At casetext, David Boyle responds to Laurence Tribe’s essay on Justice Anthony Kennedy’s majority opinion in the same-sex marriage cases. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:50 am
  Contact David here. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 5:18 am by Jeff Foust
Lucas (Oklahoma) Michael McCaul (Texas) Mo Brooks (Alabama) Larry Bucshon (Indiana) Steve Stockman (Texas) Bill Posey (Florida) David Schweikert (Arizona) Jim Bridenstine (Oklahoma) Chris Stewart (Utah) Donna Edwards (Maryland) (Ranking Member) Frederica Wilson (Florida) Suzanne Bonamici (Oregon) Dan Maffei (New York) Joe Kennedy (Massachusetts) Derek Kilmer (Washington) Ami Bera (California) Marc Veasey (Texas) Julia Brownley (California) Several NASA centers are represented in… [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 7:55 am by Dennis Kennedy
David Allen calls this the “Someday Maybe” category. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 6:28 am by Andrew Lang
There is a story to be told at some point, I am sure, which situates this kind of ‘conflicting considerations’ analysis (which we are very familiar with from the WTO’s approach to GATT Article XX) within the narratives told by of Duncan Kennedy and David Kennedy in their chapters in Trubek and Santos’ recent book on Law and Development. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:35 am by Edith Roberts
” At Casetext, David Boyle explores the much-rumored possibility that Justice Anthony Kennedy is considering retirement, noting that “taking a more cautious road by staying on for just a few more years, and then deciding whether to retire, is one nuanced and practical alternative for Kennedy. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 7:55 am by Dennis Kennedy
David Allen calls this the “Someday Maybe” category. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 8:43 pm
Well, apparently there's still time.And hey, this post is already longer than David Jenson's penis. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
 To David Savage of The Los Angeles Times, however, a tie vote seems “less likely after Wednesday’s argument. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:01 am by Heather K. Gerken
Disclaimer rules, in particular, may prove especially helpful in solving what David Schleicher terms the "mismatch problem. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:58 am
” Of the 8-1 vote, the editorial mentioned, “You've got to love it when the tort bar and Democrats accuse those notorious right-wing Justices Stephen Breyer, Anthony Kennedy and David Souter -- who joined the majority opinion -- of being the greedy tools of business. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 6:37 am by Joshua Matz
Commentators will include Judge Kathleen O’Malley, Judge James Holderman, USPTO Director David Kappos, Professor Rochelle Dreyfuss and Professor Mark Lemley. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
In The New York Review of Books, David Cole reviews three recent books on the Roberts Court – Uncertain Justice (by Laurence Tribe and former SCOTUSblog contributor Joshua Matz), In the Balance (by Mark Tushnet), and Scalia (by Bruce Murphy) – and concludes that “what most defines the Roberts Court may be its hostility to courts themselves. [read post]