Search for: "Deal v. USA"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 1,298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2008, 4:36 am
And I will wait for others to opine on whether the Fed got a good deal. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:00 am
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 2.0) 1. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 9:21 am
" Markman v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 3:54 pm
Fehribach v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 10:24 am
" Tran v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:02 pm
United States District Court Judge James Robertson for the District of Columbia, issued an order in USA v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Real Estate Broker 3 Penelope Ifill The Corcoran Group Real Estate 3 Lynn Kremsky RDK Appraisals Appraiser 3 Joel Klein LXP Investor / Developer 3 salvatore merante all bronx real estate inc re broker,appraiser,accountant 2 Walt Egelanian DJM Realty Real Estate Disposition 3 Jonathan Arnold Empire Buildings Estate Inc Broker 2 Francisco Diaz Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage - Residential 2 Nir Zeer Danrich RE Broker 3 Miri Zoarez Done… [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
This section deals specifically with Stx-producing E. coli, including specifically E. coli O157:H7. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In the aftermath of Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:53 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (GenericsWeb), Eularis analyses most effective generics defence strategies with new pharmaceutical industry report: (GenericsWeb), WIPO symposium to discuss life sciences multilateral environmental agreements: (Daily Dose of IP), Daiichi Sankyo and Ranbaxy confirm deal is binding and final, allay market rumour and speculation: (SmartBrief), Daiichi Ranbaxy takeover and the implications for the future of IP: (Spicy IP), Europe: Cancer Research Therapeutics’ RNAi patent revoked by… [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 4:45 am
Cookies have received a great deal of attention in the media because privacy advocates are concerned about the way advertisers use cookies. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 6:05 am
., Samsung Electronics America, Nokia Inc, and LG Electronics USA to its list of defendants. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 12:49 pm
To my mind, the proponents of the cost-internalization approach now face substantial difficulties on account of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
: (Spicy IP), India: Ranbaxy-Daiichi deal – Opportunities for private equity companies in India: (Profitability through Simplicity), India: (KEI) Cracking open anti-competitive practices in the developing world: complaints, amendments and waivers: (Spicy IP), India: Is it one rule for Indian pharma companies and another one for those from abroad? [read post]
Meshworks, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A.: Good News and Bad News for Creators of New Media Works
7 Jul 2008, 8:27 pm
In Meshworks, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
: (Afro-IP), WHO ‘World Health Statistics 2008’: (Spicy IP), The Ranbaxy-Daiichi deal – an ‘Ardhanarishwar’ business model? [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:50 pm
This morning’s papers included a good deal of coverage of yesterday's decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
