Search for: "Deter v. Deter"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 5,286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2011, 8:50 am
JONES v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:27 pm
On Tuesday, April 17, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Filarsky v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 11:12 am
The Court heard oral arguments on Tuesday in Herring v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 6:18 am
The case Houston Community College System v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:06 pm
City of East Wenatchee v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 12:08 pm
Novick v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 3:26 am
State v. [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 6:40 am
Hopefully, courts will continue to carefully apply these principles to deter this litigation strategy. [read post]
26 May 2017, 12:03 pm
Bond This week a federal judge in North Carolina ordered Dish Network LLC (“Dish”) to pay treble damages in the amount of $61.5 million, or $1,200 per call, to class members in a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) action against Dish, Krakauer v. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 11:21 am
This 2-1 decision in Vanegas v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 4:18 am
Azizian v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
Court Benchslaps Trade Secret Plaintiff and Counsel For Bad Faith Litigation–RBC Bearings v. Caliber
18 Aug 2016, 7:41 am
Yet, that sanction isn’t enough to deter the behavior. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
In Smith v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 4:33 am
Rather, “they are designed to punish attorneys who violate the statute and to deter them from betraying their ‘special obligation to protect the integrity of the courts and foster their truth-seeking function’ ” (id., quoting Amalfitano v Rosenberg, 12 NY3d 8, 14 [2009]). [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 5:05 am
(a) While "[p]unitive damages may properly be imposed to further a State's legitimate interests in punishing unlawful conduct and deterring its repetition," BMW of North America, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:10 pm
A hedge fund might be deterred from full and candid disclosure of sensitive commercial information to potential investors if it felt that such information might be published in breach of any confidentiality restrictions, ultimately resulting in potential investors being less informed in making their investment decisions. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 12:30 pm
See Carhart v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 3:06 pm
That was the question many in the white-collar world were asking as they awaited a decision in a case called U.S. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 12:31 am
Rranci v. [read post]
