Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 8,958
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2013, 6:35 pm
The administrative order provides for the referral of cases into the Misdemeanor Veterans Treatment Court.If a defendant appears for arraignment or disposition on eligible charges, and appears to be a veteran eligible for the Veterans Court, the defendant will be given a new disposition date within the originating division within 20 days. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 9:40 am
Doe. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 8:01 pm
Sentence A would get credit from 10/1 to 10/21: 20 days. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 1:08 pm
The Court further held that because the SBM program provides a particularized statutory procedure for imposing SBM, including a judicial hearing where the State must demonstrate that the defendant qualifies for SBM, and effecting an SBM search, the SBM program does not violate the prohibition against general warrants in Article 1, Section 20 of the North Carolina Constitution. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 3:01 am
This case does not involve such a physical intrusion or trespass. [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:02 pm
§ 20-1(A)(1). [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 1:46 pm
Id. at *1. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 12:04 pm
Id. at *1-2. [read post]
6 May 2020, 9:12 am
The jury rejected defendant’s arguments that a direct physical loss does not exist absent airborne asbestos and that a sample taken in one area of a building does not prove direct physical loss to the whole building. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 8:48 am
As in the above scenario, the defendant in Howell was convicted of Class 1 misdemeanor possession of marijuana. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 8:48 am
As in the above scenario, the defendant in Howell was convicted of Class 1 misdemeanor possession of marijuana. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 5:33 am
The Court, after an extended discussion of precedent in Kentucky and other jurisdictions, abandoned the physical impact rule and announced the proof requirements as follows: ... the plaintiff must present evidence of the recognized elements of a common law negligence claim: (1) the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff; (2) breach of that duty; (3) injury to the plaintiff, and (4) legal causation between the defendant's breach and the plaintiff's injury. ... [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 8:12 am
March 20, 2007): Gallo does not allege that the original seizure of the money was unreasonable. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
(1) Plaintiff stated claim for a free speech violation where Sheriff allegedly interfered with legal mail; defendants were not entitled to qualified immunity; (2) Qualified immunity applied to alleged Fourth Amendment violation; other claims were waived Haze v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 12:33 am
” Though Judge Kaplan had granted the motions of the three individual defendants other than Becnel with respect to the Section 10(b) allegations against them concerning the alleged internal control allegations, he denied those three defendants’ motions to dismiss the plaintiff’s control person liability claims under Section 20(a), meaning that at least some claims against all four of the individual defendants survived the motion to… [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Lori Trahan defended loaning her 2018 campaign $300,000 of her husband’s income, calling it “our money. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 5:06 pm
He may have a twenty (20) day extension of his license. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 11:26 am
Anheuser-Busch, LLC, 2021 WL 3501203, No. 20-CV-7451 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 11:31 am
.; Sept. 20, 2011) iPhone users sued Apple and various advertising networks alleging that defendants violated their privacy rights "by . . . allowing third party applications that run on [iOS devices] to collect and make use of . . . personal information without user consent or knowledge. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 11:30 am
Ryan confirms that it does not. [read post]
