Search for: "Doe Defendants 1-50" Results 1201 - 1220 of 4,078
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2019, 9:35 pm by William D. Kickham, Esq.
This will be the defendant’s one chance to prevent the Order from being made “permanent” – this usually means one (1) year. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm by The Blog Team
§2B1.1(b)(11)(C), because this provision does not apply to personal tax returns. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
But, its benchers should operate as does the Cabinet of an elected government, maximizing its use of all of the expertise and capacities of its civil service. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:58 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The issue in this case is defendant was correct in concluding that the Domestic Relations Law does not permit same-sex couples to marry. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 11:30 am
The question is, does A have a valid claim against B to recover a share of the re-sale profits? [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:37 pm by Ilya Somin
Defenders of very broad executive power might argue that these kinds of constraints on presidential power are unconstitutional. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:08 am by Michael Debarros and Trippe Hawthorne
Jan. 2015 https://www.maslon.com/webfiles/MiscArticles/50-state_Survey_of_Design_Firm_Licensure_1st_ed_Jan_2015.pdf [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 1:11 pm by Jessica Kroeze
According to the decision, the valid documents included claims 1 to 50 filed during oral proceedings on 17 October 2014. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 1:38 pm
"A prosecutor can sit at their desk and click on a defendant's name and see any case of domestic violence that occurred anywhere in New York state. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:37 am by Chukwuma Okoli
Rome II Regulation[1] governs matters of non-contractual obligations. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 12:46 am by Kevin
At approximately 9:50 a.m. that same day, Defendant paid Plaintiff a visit, and was shown two dead parrots. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 2:46 pm by Lax & Neville LLP
Regarding the Plaintiff’s challenge to the award of costs, Judge Rakoff found that “§ 3730(d)(4)’s limitation on the recovery of ‘attorneys’ fees and expenses’ does not bar an award of ‘costs’ under Rule 54 (d) (1). [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 10:05 am by Scott R. Anderson, Benjamin Wittes
We believe that the injury Trump’s refusal to publicly release the March 1 report does to these activities gives us the legal standing we need to challenge his decision in the courts. [read post]