Search for: "Doe Nos."
Results 1201 - 1220
of 2,061
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2022, 3:08 am
If it does then a contribution claim can be brought under the 1978 Act even though the contribution claim is governed by a foreign law rather than English law. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 10:41 pm
Nos. 12-1100, 12-1272 (severed June 28, 2012). [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 10:18 am
Does that makes a difference in the analysis? [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
Cir. 2012) (Case Nos. 2010-1493, -1494, -1495, -1496, 2011-1101, -1102). [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 1:09 am
The likelihood of confusion (LOC) test does not include factors that depend on the applicant itself (C-171/06 P, para. 31). [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 1:28 pm
Patent Nos. 8,257,723 and 7,744,913. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 6:34 am
John Doe Nos. 1-25, Case No. 154644/2022, NYSCEF Doc. [read post]
5 May 2010, 2:33 am
Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Shanghai) Corporation, Oppositions Nos. 91171146 and 91171147 [not precedential].Opposer Taiwan was founded in 1987 as the world's first dedicated semiconductor foundry, and remains the world's largest. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 11:04 am
In the absence of an explicit restriction, “reading” an “implicit” restriction in a provision that confers a legal right does not seem to be warranted (“ubi lex non distinguit, nec nos distinguere debemus“). [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 10:06 am
Over the course of this monitoring, Delta apparently found a high volume of products being sold illegally on Amazon by Defendants, Dmitrii Iakovlev and John Does, 1-10 (while the identities of John Does 1-10 are currently unknown, Delta intends on discovering their identities and amending its Complaint). [read post]
15 May 2015, 10:41 am
Chart 1: The “Main Points of the Adjudication” sections for Guiding Case Nos. 20, 29, and 30—the text prepared by the Supreme People’s Court to help subsequent courts understand the GCs and how to “refer to” them—read as follows: Guiding Case No. 20, Shenzhen Siruiman Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 8:20 am
As you would expect, IHOP owns a number of federal trademark registrations for IHOP and INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF PANCAKES (Registration Nos. 2332311, 2942609, 3429406, 3429405, 3514724, 3408102, and 3507059), most of which are for restaurant services and food products. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 12:15 pm
Patent Nos. 4,444,784, RE 36,481, and RE 36,520. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
It is not so clear that it does when it is applied to an activity that right-thinking persons would endorse. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:17 pm
Patent Nos. 7,031,728 (claims 3 and 10) and 7,672,681 (claims 5 and 9). [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 3:04 pm
., Nos. 09–CV–01855–LHK, 09–CV–01879, 2011 WL 864949, at *7 (N.D.Cal. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:20 pm
Patent Nos. 6,243,254 (the ‘254 patent), 6,014,309 (the ‘309 patent), and 6,266,229 (the ‘229 patent). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:02 am
Commercial Success: “[E]vidence that customers prefer to purchase a device with a slide-to-unlock capacity does not show a nexus [to the claimed invention] when the evidence does not show what alternative device consumers were comparing that device to. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 10:41 pm
Nos. 12-1100, 12-1272 (severed June 28, 2012). [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:15 am
July 11, 2011), and Doe VIII v. [read post]
