Search for: "Downs v. USA" Results 1201 - 1220 of 1,797
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The 5th Circuit struck down a similarly overbroad no-recording policy in T-Mobile USA Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 8:25 am by INFORRM
First Amendment Cases In the case of USA v Alvarez (21 March 2011), the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit refused an en banc re-hearing of an appeal in which the Stolen Valor Act 2005 had been struck down. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am by John Elwood
Owens, 13-719 (granted at the April 4 Conference, relisted once); Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), Domain name transfer made easier: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws - C Lawson: (IP Down Under), Separating Sony sheep from Grokster (and Kazaa) goats: Reckoning [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
Google’s response was simply to close down Google News in Spain. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:47 pm
Juris Zanis Pupols and JZP Enterprise-USA v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
Rather than attempt to identify a clear line between proportionality and disproportionality, or examine how rights should be balanced against each other, this article aims to do no more than describe the mixing console: identify each slider whose movement up or down the scale is capable of engaging Article 10 rights to a varying degree. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:34 pm by Howard Knopf
On Tuesday, November 8, 2016, Election Day in the USA, the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) will hear a patent case between AstraZeneca Canada Inc., et al. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:32 pm by Sean Patrick Donlan
The substantive aspects of the legal remedies at the Court of Justice, the General Court and the Civil Service Tribunal are laid down in the primary legislation, as amended by the Lisbon Treaty, while the procedural aspects are detailed in the Statute of the Court of Justice as well as the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice and the General Court. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm by Howard Knopf
Ariel and I, along with a very smart young law professor named David Lametti, who later became Minister of Justice, made the prevailing arguments in the SCC in the 2015 case of Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
Readers should now know the answer but scroll down if you don't! [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
Poetman Records USA, Inc. 2010 (Copyright Litigation Blog) District Court N D Illinios: Party claiming copyright ownership not a rule 19 necessary party: Zimnicki v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 2:05 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
Horizon Pharma USA, Inc. is a good reminder that even standard “patent lingo” can cause trouble down the line. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:46 am by Andrew Crocker and Nate Cardozo
” The notable and instructive exception is the USA Freedom Act, the first statute substantively limiting the NSA’s power in decades, born out of public consternation over the agency’s mass surveillance. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm by Steven Buchwald
For instance in Aviva USA Corp. v Vazirani, 902 F Supp 2d 1246 (D. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:43 am by Amy Howe
” Writing for the National Law Journal’s Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro reports on yesterday’s oral argument in M&G Polymers USA v. [read post]