Search for: "FELLOWS v. STATE"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 4,473
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2011, 10:07 am
Perhaps we’re being overly sensitive in rushing to the defense of a fellow blogger but if the regulators charged with protecting us all from false advertising don’t see any issues then perhaps it’s time for this rule to be amended as well. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 5:34 am
Andrew Dickinson is a Solicitor Advocate, Consultant to Clifford Chance LLP and Visiting Fellow in Private International Law at the British Institute of International & Comparative Law. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 2:45 pm
Justice O’Connor’s formulations in Grutter v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 10:42 am
In Soares, et al v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
The culture wars have embraced the Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm
June 30 is the latest the Court has sat since 1996, when the Justices took the bench on July 1 to issue just a single opinion, United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 11:38 am
Three interrelated developments explain this state of affairs. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 7:23 am
The ruling in Adams v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:00 am
" Although §27 does not define the term "salary," the Appellate Division noted that in Bransten v State of New York, 30 NY3d 434 the Court of Appeals, considering the State Constitution's Judicial Compensation Clause, Article VI, §25[a], and held that the state's employer contributions toward a justice's health insurance coverage "is not part of [his or her] judicial salary" nor considered "a permanent… [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:00 am
" Although §27 does not define the term "salary," the Appellate Division noted that in Bransten v State of New York, 30 NY3d 434 the Court of Appeals, considering the State Constitution's Judicial Compensation Clause, Article VI, §25[a], and held that the state's employer contributions toward a justice's health insurance coverage "is not part of [his or her] judicial salary" nor considered "a permanent… [read post]
22 May 2014, 1:44 pm
To be sure, that can't explain the problems occurring in "many other places," though it is not entirely beside the point that many of these "other places" might be in better shape if the United States were capable of responding adequately to the problems facing all states in our globalized political order. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 6:17 am
This was underscored in the 2003 case of State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:01 am
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 5:02 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 10:11 am
United States (07-548) (see here) and on Friday in CSX Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 4:02 am
It distributes an electric "Vélosolex" under the name of "eSolex". [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 6:17 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I just ran across Nero v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 8:41 am
” (Gorsuch was referring to United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 10:40 pm
In Pleasant Glade Assembly of God v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 6:16 am
Cain, Visiting Research Fellow at the Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance; Robert J. [read post]
