Search for: "FOX v. STATE" Results 1201 - 1220 of 3,150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court upheld the convictions of the defendants in a notorious murder trial over a claim that evidence had been suppressed in violation of Brady v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Paul Alan Levy of Public Citizen — who took the lead in blowing open the (separate) Richart Ruddie/Profile Defenders deindexing fraud story — has just gone to court to set aside the order in one such case, Welter v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:16 am by Staley Smith
Writing for the majority in Maslenjak v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
  The United States Supreme Court granted cert this week in Carpenter v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
That was and will be the broadest statute to revive SOLs in the United States, because the Supreme Court considered the law and held that criminal SOLs may not be revived, because that would violate the Ex Post Facto Clause in Stogner v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 6:43 am by Adam J. White
Fox, justify an exception to the usual rule of judicial deference to an agency’s policy reversals? [read post]
30 May 2017, 5:17 am by Howard Knopf
This category typically includes “speaking orders” or “endorsement”-style decisions, including judgments rendered orally in open court and reduced to writing thereafter.Interestingly, the same learned Judge in 2013 awarded an eye-catching sum of $10.5 million of statutory damages in a default judgment in Twentieth Century Fox v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 5:17 am by Howard Knopf
This category typically includes “speaking orders” or “endorsement”-style decisions, including judgments rendered orally in open court and reduced to writing thereafter.Interestingly, the same learned Judge in 2013 awarded an eye-catching sum of $10.5 million of statutory damages in a default judgment in Twentieth Century Fox v. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Reading the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]