Search for: "GEORGE v. STATE" Results 1201 - 1220 of 7,213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2009, 9:10 am by Lawrence Solum
Drew, which considered whether Terms of Service violations trigger CFAA liability, and United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 12:06 am
Here is the abstract:The Supreme Court's FEC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 2:17 pm by Kevin
" National Assoc. of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Ken Womble, Fault Lines on Long Island case of People v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Smith, and others; Halbrook on the Court’s decision to hear New York State Rifle and Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Catherine Morris
The recent findings of an international trial monitoring panel in the case of United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
It's not quite eleven-a-side, but the much-contested case of Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA, Union de Associations de Football, British Sky Broadcasting Limited, Setanta Sports SARL, Group Canal Plus SA and The Motion Picture Association v QC Leisure, David Richardson, AV Station plc, Malcolm Chamberlain, Michael Madden, Sanjay Raval, David Greenslade, SR Leisure Ltd, Philip George Charles Houghton and Derek Owen; The Secretary… [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:32 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 114470 (SD FL, July 9, 2018), a Florida federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing a suit by an inmate alleging that a chain and crucifix were improperly kept from him on the grounds they were purchased from an unauthorized vendor.In George v. [read post]
The plaintiff, George Stewart, is a Texas man who was denied admission to all six public medical schools. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Derrick George
Michigan and federal laws sometimes differ or conflict depending on each state’s legislation. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 6:00 am
Of possible tangential value to embassies and consulates is the United States District Court for the District of Columbia decision of September 19, 2007 in the matter Menachem Binyamin Zivitofsky et al. v. [read post]