Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 36,740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2024, 9:50 am
In Muldrow v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:31 am
by Dennis Crouch In WesternGeco v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:26 am
Last month, Mr Justice Warby handed down judgment in Monroe v Hopkins [2017] EWHC 433 (QB), the first libel case to consider the “serious harm” test under section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013 within the context of a social media post. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 8:56 am
Apple v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 10:34 am
Additional Resources: Kelter v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 11:41 pm
Part two of the trial court's permanent injunction decision in MGM v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:20 am
In Neumann v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 6:11 am
Council v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 9:00 am
AM General Holdings LLC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 10:45 am
In Spokeo v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 11:50 pm
Practice point: The statute provides the exclusive remedy for an employee seeking damages for unintentional injuries incurred in the course of employment.Student note: An intentional tort may give rise to a cause of action outside the ambit of the statute, but the complaint must allege an employer’s deliberate act directed at causing harm to this particular plaintiff.Kruger v. [read post]
15 Oct 2003, 2:16 pm
Held: Guilty of causing grievous bodily harm. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 9:56 am
Almost everyone knows by now that in a still-controversial decision, DeShaney v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
In a 5-4 decision in Thole v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:08 am
Practice point: The touchstone of any § 240(1) claim is whether the harm flows directly from the application of the force of gravity.Student note: A worker may recover under the statute even if he did not actually fall, or if he was injured while preventing himself from falling.Case: Reavely v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
In a 5-4 decision in Thole v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:37 am
Today's advance release tort law opinion: Ocasio v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 7:33 am
This case declared that government has no affirmative duty to protect or rescue individuals from private harm. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 1:10 pm
In Rich v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 6:01 am
However, as the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held in Dorchester Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
