Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF D. B., A CHILD"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 2,182
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2014, 5:46 am
From the ABA Journal, I learned about an interesting self-defense case in South Carolina that is causing some controversy. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 1:46 pm
Dost, 636 F.Supp. 828, 832 (S.D .Cal.1986), aff'd sub nom. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:29 am
I thought I’d pass along an excerpt of an interesting case that was just posted on Westlaw, Matter of P.P. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am
Splitting those apart is the point of the paper.Poor theory of distinctiveness + incredibly strong rights = trademark proliferation, land grab for expressive components of society b/c it’s in their interests to do so. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
§71[b][1][D]). [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 1:29 pm
D/B/A AT&T TEXAS v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 4:18 pm
D. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 4:26 am
Additionally, a separate federal lawsuit with Capitol Records (d/b/a EMI) as the sole plaintiff was filed against Escape in the Southern District Court of New York in 2012. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 5:14 am
EVID. 404(b) of the same minor girl [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 3:50 am
B. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 2:59 am
Which judgments are precedent – persuasive, binding or just interesting? [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm
(b) Necessary household goods, furnishings, electronics, wearing apparel, other personal effects and yard equipment, not to exceed $12,000 in value, belonging to the judgment debtor or a dependent of the judgment debtor, to be selected by the judgment debtor. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm
(b) Necessary household goods, furnishings, electronics, wearing apparel, other personal effects and yard equipment, not to exceed $12,000 in value, belonging to the judgment debtor or a dependent of the judgment debtor, to be selected by the judgment debtor. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 12:39 pm
Out of the marriage, four children were born- A and B, twins who are aged three, C, aged two, and D, aged one. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am
Exceptional Child Center, Inc. 14-15Issue: (1) Whether the Supremacy Clause gives Medicaid providers a private right of action to enforce 42 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 3:12 pm
I’d say “No” and “Yes” respectively (but then I’m a child lawyer not a transport lawyer). [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 11:12 pm
Perhaps the most interesting part of this opinion is concern as to how the Minute Entry, which stated that the Court had considered the “testimony” of the witnesses, contradicted the hearing transcript: “[D]espite the trial court’s written statement (Minute Entry) that it had considered the testimony of both parties, it received no testimony at all. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:14 am
Instead, they allowed the Bible Believers to proceed until the threat of “violent retaliation and physical injury” became too great, at which point they “discharge[d] their duty of preserving the peace by … by removing the speaker[s] for [their] own protection. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 10:55 pm
I’d be very interested to know if anyone has a different view. [read post]
