Search for: "In Re Application for Water Rights"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 1,503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2012, 4:06 pm
Justin Hughes: This sounds like an alternative to Dastar, not an application, because it wouldn’t have the Lanham Act/moral rights implications for rights of attribution. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:55 am
Like water flowing in a mountain stream or the air that we breathe? [read post]
5 May 2008, 10:16 pm
Because water can render a hearing aid ineffective, the department was allowed to refer to the applicant's uncorrected hearing in making the decision.Moreover, the ADA does not require an accommodation that would impose an "undue hardship" on the employer. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 10:01 pm
Among the changes made as a result of public involvement is FDA’s decision to not apply its produce rules to farms with $25,000 or less in produce sales and easing up on water-quality testing so the source of the water is taken into account. 5. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:54 am
If you’re interested, we have more detail on the Court’s reasoning, and the reasoning of the dissent, below. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:29 am
Chevron (2008); Advocate for the Agriculture and Agriculture Law (2007); The Reviewability of Rule in Korea, China and Japan (2007); The Text and Intent in Interpretation of Administrative Law (2007); The Historical Transition of Management Subjects of Agricultural Water & Water Rights (2007); The Substantial Evidence Test in the Federal Administrative Procedure Act (2007); LEGAL ISSUES IN EVERYDAY LIFE (2006); ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS (coauthor) (2005).Lauren… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
These were resisted by the then government on the basis that they would be watering down the effects of DTs and "would effectively require a double possession hearing". [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
These were resisted by the then government on the basis that they would be watering down the effects of DTs and "would effectively require a double possession hearing". [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Administrative law -- Agency for Health Care Administration -- Attorney's fees -- Action arising from Department of Administrative Hearings' finding that AHCA's withdrawal of an application for a home health care facility license, due to what the AHCA perceived as an incomplete application, was incorrect -- Error to award applicant attorney's fees and costs pursuant to section 57.111 despite favorable order from DOAH -- Where, at the time the withdrawal… [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
United States Docket: 09-293 Issue: Whether a litigant moving to re-open a suppression hearing to introduce additional evidence must justify his failure to introduce that evidence at the initial hearing. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
The staggering consequences of the spill force us to ask whether applicable laws are fair, consistent, and up-to-date. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 12:30 pm
So we're taking the extraordinary step of granting an injunction pending appeal. [read post]
26 May 2017, 8:21 am
(Recommendation 149) This proposal is pretty much exactly what I recommended should happen back in this 2014 blog post about Toyota, right down to the 20% figure. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 3:42 am
Supp. 909 (D.D.C., 1988), the defendant, a citizen of Lebanon and a leader in the hijacking of a plane, was lured onto a yacht off the coast of Cyprus by FBI officials posing as drug dealers and then arrested in international waters. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:35 am
On 4 December 2015 Dingemans J heard an application in the case of Horan v Express Newspapers. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
The court further held that three plaintiffs have exhausted applicable internal prison grievance proceedings while the remaining ten have not. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:55 am
If not, then they’re blowing hot air. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:17 pm
"Critically undercapitalized" means you're dead. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
Re-entry programs, job training, and real estate site mitigation and upkeep. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:15 am
But, you do know what I’m saying, right? [read post]
