Search for: "In re A. V."
Results 1201 - 1220
of 62,903
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
During the oral argument yesterday in Murthy v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:36 pm
(Rafael Henrique | Dreamstime.com)On Monday, the Supreme Court held oral argument in Murthy v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:00 pm
The trial court has discretion, so it needs to exercise it.The reason I say that Justice Baltodano (alongside the rest of the panel) deserves kudos is because:(1) Trial counsel didn't file an appeal -- even though they're supposed to if there's any arguable issue (which there was here) -- so all that the Court of Appeal had was the Mother's pro se submission. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 12:43 pm
Rigsby v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 10:56 am
LLC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:46 am
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 8:02 am
So let's hear all of our DeSantis judges make a speech today against Gideon v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:32 am
The Appellate Division last week in Behler v Tao (read here) affirmed the order below in a 3-2 decision featuring a majority opinion authored by Presiding Justice Sallie Manzanet-Daniels, applying what she labels “explicitly contractarian” Delaware LLC law “sometimes leading to harsh results,” and a dissenting opinion authored by Justice Ellen Gesmer exalting “basic principles of contract law and fundamental fairness. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:09 am
Good morning,If you’re set on checking a bag of crab meat next time you fly, you’re in luck. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 12:37 am
Mais tout récemment, le retour du projet de loi de fusion de l'IRS et l'ASN m'a intrigué et, pour la forme, m'a amené à une vérification des motifs réels derrière ce projet. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 7:59 am
So, if you're going to make a new wine, it might be a good idea to put it in new bottles. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Les parties reprennent devant la Cour, pour l’essentiel, le débat qui a eu lieu en première instance. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm
After all, Missouri v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 7:57 am
” In re Marriage of Lorton, 203 Ill. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:39 am
West v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am
The debate over what is often termed “jawboning” will come before the Supreme Court, which will hear arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 8:55 pm
B.L., Austin v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 5:15 pm
But Judge Sutton's representation still result in important questions unaddressed by the memo—if a particular judicial district does adopt this policy, could it be potentially retroactive and result in the re-assignment of currently-pending cases? [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 2:33 pm
Something like this is what happened in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
