Search for: "In the Matter of Perry" Results 1201 - 1220 of 2,241
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2012, 8:09 am by Sam Favate
Scott Perry, a Republican, who said “I don’t know that I’m against it,” referring to transvaginal ultrasounds, but added: “I’m not sure it needs to be mandated. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 2:54 am by Andrew Trask
Professor WIlliam Hubbard wondered if, as a matter of economics, the class action can get too large to certify. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 5:46 am by larrywalker
Respect for the clock and the need to cover other subjects was the only thing that got us off of Perry basketball and ‘Fessor and onto “other Perry matters”. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:23 am by John Palley
 I have personally conducted probates in just about every single probate Court in the state and currently have matters pending in about 10 different counties; Sacramento, Placer, El Dorado, Yolo, Contra Costa, Solano, Alameda, Santa Clara, San Mateo, Los Angeles (multiple courts), and the list goes on! [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:15 am by Gritsforbreakfast
SCOTUS chickened out on addressing perhaps the most high-stakes question in constitutional law, which leaves the matter in the hands of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, and thereafter quite literally at the mercy of the Board of Pardons and Paroles and Gov. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:53 am by guest-writer
No further comments will be made on this matter, and we thank you for your understanding. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:38 pm by GuestPost
The District Court decision in Perry narrowed this to rational basis review. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:33 pm by Eoin Daly
The District Court decision in Perry narrowed this to rational basis review. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:54 am by Lovechilde
These included three hedge-fund managers and Houston Republican Bob Perry, the main funder behind the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth in 2004, whose scurrilous ads did such an effective job of destroying John Kerry’s electoral prospects. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:15 am by Russ Bensing
” Turns out it doesn’t matter, because, the court finds, there was no way the jury could have believed that Perry would be guilty if he only caused “some harm”:  the allegations and the evidence was such that the jury understood Perry could be convicted only if they showed he intended to cause serious physical harm. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 11:26 pm by Daniel Richardson
  The SCOV reverses the trial court and rules that the lower court may not consider the codicil as a matter of law. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:00 am
This is good news for the former couple who do not have to litigate this matter in court. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 10:36 am by Rosemary Harris Lytle, ACLU of Colorado
In 1958, Mildred Delores Jeter and Richard Perry Loving left their home in Virginia because as an interracial couple they couldn’t be married there. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:27 pm
 Here I want to ask more generally: When does and should the distinction between failure-to-give and taking-away matter in the law? [read post]