Search for: "Jones v State" Results 1201 - 1220 of 6,136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2012, 6:37 am
See Jones, 29 F.3d at 830 (finding that the defendants, who were employees of a state agency, were in privity with that state agency, which was the defendant in the first action); see also Schuster v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 11:30 am by Dan Ernst
Jones are wrong about the state of the law in 1791. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:08 am by Kali Borkoski
On Monday, SCOTUSblog will kick off an online symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:38 am by Phil Cave
SCOTUS decided United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Jessica Jones, Matrix Chambers
An earlier domestic judgment, R v Zardad, also supported the position that a person acting on behalf of a non-State entity may be acting in an official capacity for the purposes of s 134 if the non-State entity “had a sufficient degree of organisation, a sufficient degree of actual control of an area and […] exercised the type of functions which a government or governmental organisation would exercise” [63]. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 5:12 pm by LTA-Editor
By Nicholas Ulrich A year ago, the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:20 am by Dan Gauss
The tracking happened before the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:35 pm by Cyrus Farivar
Back in August 2012, we reported on how the American Civil Liberties Union was compelling the FBI to fully disclose how it interprets the results of the United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:47 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Here is the abstract: In the Supreme Court's recent decision on GPS monitoring, United States v.... [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Today was the deadline for all amici supporting Harris Associates to file their briefs in the Supreme Court case of Jones v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:48 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The majority of the Court (Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lady Arden and Lord Burrows) allow Libya’s appeal on the first issue. [read post]