Search for: "Kerr v. Kerr" Results 1201 - 1220 of 2,070
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2015, 2:16 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
She also agreed more with Lord Kerr that the material collectively provided by the publication of the book “Slaughter and Deception at Batang Kali” in June 2009 and the access gained to the Metropolitan and Royal Malaysian Police files “cast an entirely new light on the decision not to hold an inquiry”. [read post]
15 May 2019, 2:57 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Also dissenting, Lord Kerr held that the manifestly without reasonable foundation test should not be imported into the national court’s consideration of a measure’s proportionality. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 4:07 pm
By Jonathan Hunter: In a highly anticipated decision, the Tenth Circuit held this week that the district court had subject matter jurisdiction over a qui tam action filed by an MMS auditor concerning royalty payments on crude oil produced from offshore federal leases. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:25 pm by Orin S. Kerr
In light of that exchange, I thought I might point out that today, in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 6:50 am by Jeralyn
Orin Kerr points out the facts of the case are not quite clear. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:17 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal today gave judgment in the case of ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 439). [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:13 am by Rachel Sachs
Holder and Shelby County v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 3:28 pm by Kiera Flynn
Briefly: Yesterday in Camreta v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:29 am by Charlie Tomlinson, Olswang LLP
Appeal to the Supreme Court The appeal was heard by the Supreme Court on 10 November 2014 by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson and Lord Hodge. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:54 am by Kali Borkoski
Writing for the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr discusses a recent concurring opinion by two judges on the Sixth Circuit in a case on remand after the Court’s unanimous decision in Abbott v. [read post]