Search for: "Kerr v. State" Results 1201 - 1220 of 1,614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2011, 3:33 am by SHG
Otherwise, chances are pretty good that they will believe that you ruined their chances of "justice" by failing to raise that winner point, the one you left on the table.But try to cover them all and you can anticipate some snarky judge to write what Third Circuit Judge Aldisert did in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am by SHG
In a post at Slate, my buddy Cristian Farias writes about Chief Justice John Roberts’ cute quip during oral argument in Rodriquez v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:55 am by SHG
Remember how cool it was when the Third Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:42 pm
Frye that offers new insight on U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:50 pm
At Reuters, James Vicini has this article on the decision, "a defeat for California officials"; David Stout reports here in the New York Times; McClatchy's Michael Doyle has this story discussing the ruling, which affirms passengers' constitutional rights to search-and-seizure protections; at Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr weighs in here on the Brendlin decision, stating "Justice Souter's opinion gets it right". [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 7:03 am by Anna Christensen
At Law.com, Tony Mauro and Carrie Levine report that the video game industry has been soliciting the support of state attorneys general in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 10:17 am by Conor McEvily
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Erwin Chemerinsky argues that the Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:40 am by Bexis
Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp., 37 F.3d 96, 101 (3d Cir. 1994); City of Philadelphia v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lord Kerr and Lord Reed. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:44 am by Nabiha Syed
  In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Michael McGough examines United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 9:04 am by David Stras
   Second, he states that the Court’s decision in Pearson v. [read post]