Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 7,482
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
First Classics, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 7:00 am
Given the extreme importance of expert testimony to litigation, is the reliability test for expert testimony set out in Daubert v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
First Classics, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 8:01 am
Shapero v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 11:18 am
The Supreme Court issued an opinion in Maples v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Brian Dodd v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 7:48 am
Even a relatively well-educated lay jury isn't well situated to resolve which expert is telling the truth. [read post]
18 May 2023, 2:13 pm
In Pham v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
In the recent decision of Grant v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:01 am
by Dennis Crouch Samsung v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:18 pm
A recent case from the Tennessee Court of Appeals, Guess v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:31 pm
Olson v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:19 am
The thing is an inflatable back rest (goes from head to seat) that you lay on the seat behind you then inflate only partially using a tube next to your head (just 10-11 breaths), then relax back into. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 10:33 am
When the police arrived, defendant lay on the ground, sliding his gun forward and assuming a prone position. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:00 am
” Rogin v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:32 am
Read more… 167 more words UPDATE: 6/24/2013 The Supreme Court issues their decision on Fischer v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 9:21 pm
DAVID BERNSTEIN: The Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 9:50 pm
For more, see the complaint filed in SEC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 2:48 pm
Waits vs Frito Lay Listen to this podcast episode here. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 6:49 pm
NASCAR Racing.jpg In an auto racing antitrust action, the Sixth Circuit affirms summary judgment for the defendant racing association after trial court strikes as unreliable the plaintiff’s experts’ testimony on the relevant markets, noting a circuit split on the need for expert economic testimony to show a relevant market; the Sixth Circuit finds lay testimony was insufficient to establish a reliable economic foundation to determine the affected market for… [read post]
