Search for: "Little v. Little" Results 1201 - 1220 of 39,468
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am by Beatrice Yahia
” Japan said it has asked the United States to suspend all non-emergency V-22 Osprey flights over its region after one of the U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by David Pocklington
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during November 2023 Eleven consistory court judgments were circulated in November and relate to reordering, exhumation, and churchyards. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:58 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Tomorrow the Supreme Court hears oral argument in Securities Exchange Commission v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:56 am by Santiago Stocker
To begin with, elections facilitating democratic transition from military rule appear to have little chance of success without three elements: robust domestic and international observation and strong international pressure. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 12:29 pm by JURIST Staff
In this first-of-its-kind JURIST “global dispatch” on a single topic, 15 law students and young lawyers from around the world, all of them JURIST correspondents from outside of Israel and Palestine, join together to offer a  panoramic view of how the current Gaza conflict is unfolding in their countries and regions. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 10:27 am by Jason Rantanen
  We have been told by many that the $2.2 billion Intel v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:34 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
For interested readers, here are links to recent articles on Ng v Asquared and O’Mahony v Whiston. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:51 am by Elizabeth Goitein
Absent a reliable process to weed out those who are most likely to violate querying restrictions, there is little reason to think this solution would be helpful. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Lopez (invalidating the Gun Free School Zones Act as beyond the scope of Congressional power) and Gonzales v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by Eleonora Rosati
Despite many of us trade mark lawyers doubting the scope of protection of what was little more than a circle of one colour on a square of another, Lidl won – convincingly. [read post]