Search for: "Lynch v. State" Results 1201 - 1220 of 1,528
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2013, 7:39 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Caregivers could only be members of CA if a qualifying patient with whom he or she was connected through the state’s registration process was also a member. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 7:01 am by John Steele
 At oral argument, the Second Circuit Panel, consisting of Judges Lynch, Walker and Gleeson, appeared to paint the parties into a corner, first eliciting a representation from Jacoby & Meyers that it decided not to challenge the New York statutes out of concern that the district court might abstain from deciding the case (under Railroad Commission v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 6:15 pm by carie
Then, both sides can ask questions and take turns dismissing jurors using what are called peremptory strikes (the number of strikes varies by state, but it is often enough for one side to eliminate all qualified minorities).In a 1986 case, Batson v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 1:04 pm by Law Lady
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ACTING THROUGH FARM SERVICE AGENCY, f/k/a FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Appellee. 1st District.Attorney Disqualification: BOFA SEEKS TO OUST AIG LAW FIRM FROM $10 BILLION CASE, AIG v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Lynch, No. 05-6048 Criminal possession of a weapon and attempted burglary are each considered "violent felonies" under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. 924(e) to justify a statutory minimum of fifteen years' imprisonment when there are three prior violent felony convictions. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 12:53 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Courts have regularly applied the rationality standard in upholding special conditions requiring convicted sex offenders to secure residences approved by the Division of Parole prior to release from DOCS custody to parole supervision as in Breeden v Donelli, Lynch v West, Billups v New York State Division of Parole and Wilson v Keane. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 2:42 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Courts have regularly applied the rationality standard in upholding special conditions requiring convicted sex offenders to secure residences approved by the Division of Parole prior to release from DOCS custody to parole supervision as in Breeden v Donelli, Lynch v West, Billups v New York State Division of Parole and Wilson v Keane. [read post]
3 May 2008, 6:37 pm by Joseph E. Conley, Jr.
  One court was persuaded that prelusion should operate in these circumstances, Lynch v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:23 pm by Alfred Brophy
 In the immediate years after the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]