Search for: "MATTER OF A J S"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 19,320
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2024, 12:36 pm
Barry J. [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 3:00 pm
” Michael J. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 10:37 am
Please check out Paul Sullivan’s column Wealth Matters titled How to Avoid Forgeries When Buying Fine Art in today’s New York Times, link below: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/03/your-money/is-that-a-real-motherwell-better-make-sure-before-buying.html? [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 1:33 am
Matter of Anderson, 16 I&N Dec. 596 (BIA 1978). [read post]
4 May 2023, 6:58 am
In 2023 CanLII 13643 (CALA), arbitrator Graham J. [read post]
16 May 2007, 4:27 am
J.). [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
In its decision J 9/84 [4] the Legal Board of appeal explained that the main purpose of R 31 EPC [1973] was “to induce the applicant to limit the protection sought to a certain number of claims, in the first instance for the purposes of the European search”. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 1:52 am
"John Simpson, stem cell project director for the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, said it didn't matter that the scientists backing his group's challenge had applied for patents themselves. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 5:00 am
May 31, 2022 Crumlish, J.), the trial court filed a Rule 1925 Opinion to the appellate court recommending the dismissal of the Defendant’s appeal from the trial court’s Order dismissing the Defendant’s objections to jurisdiction.It was the position of the trial court that the Order dismissing the Defendant’s objection to jurisdiction was appealable only under Pa.R.A.P. 311(b) and that the requirements of that Rule had not been met. [read post]
18 May 2010, 3:11 am
Stephen J. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 11:00 am
In R(Alansi) v Newham LBC, Stuart-Smith J held that, although Ms Alansi had a legitimate expectation that she would remain a priority homeseeker on Newham’s housing register, Newham had not acted unreasonably and in abuse of its power by withdrawing its representation. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 3:30 am
J. of Const. [read post]
14 Jun 2006, 6:53 am
., concur in part and dissent in part.Pfeifer, J., dissents.Thomas J. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:52 am
Malloy, Matthew J. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 12:00 pm
Douglas, William J. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 7:02 am
Kaz USA, Inc., 1-13-cv-10628 (MAD December 7, 2015, Order) (Stearns, J.) [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 7:04 am
The Commission affirmed the ALJ's final initial determination that no violation of section 337 occurred with respect to complainant's vehicle accessory patents and rejected respondent's argument that the claims were directed to unpatentable subject matter because they were directed to a human organism. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 7:01 am
Following summary judgment of invalidity for lack of patentable subject matter the court denied plaintiff's motion for attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:17 am
Following judgment on the pleadings that plaintiff's decision-making patent was invalid as claiming unpatentable subject matter, the court granted defendant's motion for attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
