Search for: "Marks v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 1,626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2012, 4:03 am
May 2, 2012): After the September 11, 2011 attacks on the United States, the government detained Jose Padilla, an American citizen, as an enemy combatant. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:10 pm
Overall, the DOJ proudly announces that more than "$2 billion" has been recovered from other drug manufacturers that were alleged to have engaged in the same type of conduct.The most interesting qui tam I found this week was the Department of Justice's announcement that it is intervening in US ex rel Dickson v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:05 pm
Fisher writes: After the September 11, 2011 attacks on the United States, the government detained Jose Padilla, an American citizen, as an enemy combatant. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:07 am
Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) from 2001 to 2003, liable for damages they allege they suffered from these unlawful actions. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
JERICHO STATE CAPITAL CORP. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:06 am
Prior to his current position, he states he was a Vice President in the Portfolio Retention Department at Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, and prior to that he says he was Vice President of Loan Services at World Savings Bank, FSB. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
R (on the application of AM) v Secretary of State for [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 12:01 pm
In Turner v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:36 am
An Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) told him to proceed with drafting the affidavit. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:37 am
The Court also released an opinion yesterday in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 9:08 am
The same paper talked with a bunch of antitrust experts and put what they said about United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:03 pm
As we mark the 25th anniversary of McCleskey v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:19 am
Austin v UK and Von Hannover v Germany (No 2) It is in this context that the cases of Austin v UK and Von Hannover (No 2) are considered, in order to argue that certain of the proposals currently being put forward are echoed in dominant themes within the judgments. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 9:57 pm
” United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
United States, in which the Justices will consider whether purposefully flooding land is a Fifth Amendment taking. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 10:22 am
Chief Justice Roberts began by setting out the conditions for a political question: “where there is a textually demonstrable constitutional commitment of the issue to a coordinate political department; or a lack of judicially discoverable and manageable standards for resolving it” (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:24 am
See Marks v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
