Search for: "Matter of Clark v Clark" Results 1201 - 1220 of 1,912
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2014, 2:02 pm by Jonathan Bailey
However, regarding the programming issue, the debate of whether or not APIs can be copyrighted is a key issue in the Oracle v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
  We conclude, however, as a matter of law, that defendant may not be held liable for failing to withdraw its product from the market. . . . [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am by Dennis Crouch
Bancorp, et al., No. 15-591 (Whether subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:56 pm by Matthew Flinn
This was demonstrated in 2006 when the Home Secretary Charles Clarke was urged to resign when it was discovered that about 1,000 FNPs had been released without being considered for deportation. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 2:24 pm
AT&T Corp., the Beaumont jury sided with the plaintiff but shortly after the case concluded Judge Clark granted the defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law, shifting this case to the defendant's column. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:00 am by Legal Beagle
Heather Capital - Lord Woolman’s opinion: Heather Capital Ltd (In Liquidation) v Levy & McRae and othersOUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION[2015] CSOH 115 CA207/14NOTE BY LORD WOOLMANIn the causeHEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) Pursuers; againstLEVY & McRAE AND OTHERS Defenders:Pursuer:  Lord Davidson of Glen Clova QC;  Shepherd & Wedderburn LLPDefenders:  Clark QC, J Brown;  Simpson & Marwick14 August… [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 12:29 pm
So that is a measure of how far matters have progressed from the pre-Crawford era, and perhaps the immediate post-Crawford era as well.In State v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:37 am by Rebecca M. Guidry
  The Fifth Circuit affirmed the federal district court’s order denying[3] SRA-L’s Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction by applying the Circuit’s well-established six-factor test of Clark v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 11:46 am by Beck, et al.
To put this all in legal terms, we think that the various stresses of bodily environment should always be - as a matter of law - a "reasonable secondary cause" of device failure in any implant case that would preclude using any form of res ipsa loquitur or "malfunction" theory. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am by Kelly
SEB (Patently-O) United Technologies Corporation – ITC institutes investigation (337-TA-751) regarding Certain Turbomachinery Blades, Engines (ITC Law Blog) US Copyright Public Knowledge proposes plan to modernize copyright office (Public Knowledge) University of Michigan releases bibliographic records into public domain via CC0 (Creative Commons) US Copyright – Decisions District Court Massachusetts grants summary judgment in cook book copyright case: Hassett v Hasselbeck (The… [read post]