Search for: "Matter of GP"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 1,780
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2012, 11:08 am
· Google may collect information about your location using GPS signals sent by a mobile device or sensor data searching for nearby WiFi access points and cell towers. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:30 am
For more discussion about privacy issues, please read my recent eCommerce Times column entitled “GPS, Privacy and the Supreme Court” which expands my blog about the 9-0 ruling from the Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:06 pm
Jones, federal agents attached a GPS tracking device, without a warrant, to the undercarriage of a defendant's vehicle. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:32 pm
The official, who was not authorized to comment publicly on the matter, said the GPS directive was issued until further legal guidance is provided on the use of the technology. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 1:13 am
Yet the opinion itself is far more interesting than the ruling of the case because the Court's dicta (outside the ruling on the matter at hand) raises some profound issues. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 1:13 am
Yet the opinion itself is far more interesting than the ruling of the case because the Court's dicta (outside the ruling on the matter at hand) raises some profound issues. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:45 pm
Today's issue of Fat Friday contains these articles: Eamon Wall, Let's Not Forget Android's Advantage In The GPS Navigation World Stephen Seldin, The Truth About The Scansnap S1500 Series Plus PDF Software William Henderson, A Conundrum: Flat Fees For Litigation Question Of The Week: Please Share Your Top Technology Tip Don't miss this issue — or any future issues. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 10:17 am
However, it is certainly foreseeable that employees of private employers could cite to this case in support of claims that GPS monitoring, or any sort of electronic monitoring for that matter, during non-working hours violated their “reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:45 pm
The police install GPS devices on cars, not homes. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:53 am
Alito 2 (“It is clear that the attachment of the GPS device was not itself a search . . . . [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:45 am
Jones, the GPS case, which I discussed last week. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:44 am
the @nytimes editorial page says "Filibustering Nominees Must End" pjblack.me/AzNM7q Image via Wikipedia from the @nytimes: "In the GPS Case, Issues of Privacy and Technology" pjblack.me/wPHv0k from @tnw: "Social Media: The New American Brain Drain" pjblack.me/xQFHBw good question: "Brands Pay Celebs for Tweets, but who Pays Twitter? [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm
Matter of Cunningham v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 10:18 am
But the use of longer term GPS monitoring in investigations of most offenses impinges on expectations of privacy. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
Why does it matter that the court reached back to early trespass notions to justify its decision? [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:50 am
As a matter of existing doctrine, he asked the right question, but when applied to the government, the standard he used could turn our lives into the proverbial open book, and soon. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 6:17 pm
The Supreme Court ruled today that the Fourth Amendment still matters in the Social Media Age. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:15 am
— from Workplace Privacy Counsel What Employers Should Know about the Supreme Court’s Decision Concerning GPS Privacy Rights — from Minnesota Employer The Small Business Social Media Cheat Sheet — from Flowtown Married to Your Business Twitter or Facebook Account? [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 12:17 pm
To make matters even more confusing, as Tom Goldstein pointed out at SCOTUSBlog, most of the mainstream media misinterpreted the opinion to say a warrant is required to use GPS tracking on a personal vehicle. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 11:05 am
While the case turned on the fact that the government physically placed a GPS device on Mr. [read post]
