Search for: "Matter of Kennedy" Results 1201 - 1220 of 4,825
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2010, 9:50 pm by dmk
Twitter: @collabtools Listen to The Kennedy-Mighell Report podcast on Legal Talk Network. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 2:55 pm
If Paterson selected Kennedy, I suspect that Obama and Kennedy would be praising him to the high heavens. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 7:12 pm by Jeff Redding
-argued and a Justice Kennedy-authored marriage-affirming opinion. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:50 pm by dmk
Twitter: @collabtools Listen to The Kennedy-Mighell Report podcast on Legal Talk Network. [read post]
16 May 2014, 7:30 am by MBettman
Kennedy believes that the determination of what constitutes a reasonable period of time in a given case must be determined as a matter of law based on the facts of that particular case. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:54 pm by Amy Howe
On Wednesday morning, the Court spent seventy-six minutes – well more than the one hour originally allotted – deliberating the constitutionality of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which requires states and local governments with a history of discrimination to get permission from the federal government before making any changes, no matter how small, to their voting procedures. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:56 am by Abbe Gluck
As I have  previously elaborated, the Court remains woefully inconsistent about these matters. [read post]
3 Apr 2021, 6:52 am
 How much should private moral character matter with public officials? [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 11:23 am by Stephen Griffin
  Just as much as Heller served as an endorsement of OPM, Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion in Obergefell is a symphony, a festival of living constitutionalism. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 5:01 am by Joanna Schwartz
If the Supreme Court continues to issue qualified immunity decisions that ignore evidence about its fundamental flaws, lower courts may need to take matters into their own hands. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:01 am by Joseph Fishkin
The Court’s extensive discussion of stare decisis provides a kind of dark preview of where the post-Kennedy Court’s First Amendment jurisprudence might go in the future. [read post]
20 May 2009, 3:15 am
Senior Justices can still consider petitions for certiorari (discretionary appeals), serve on other federal appellate courts, and handle matters that regularly come before individual Justices. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 4:01 am
Over the next decade, that interpretation of Brown became increasingly untenable as a legal matter, and was decisively rejected in Green v. [read post]