Search for: "Matter of S.W." Results 1201 - 1220 of 1,494
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2010, 4:11 am by Maxwell Kennerly
It seemed the Court was intent on excluding that email no matter what the plaintiffs said, which makes me wonder if it was really malpractice not to get the email admitted. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm by Bexis
 Id.The market share claim was also dismissed under New York law, even though the New York Court of Appeals, in one of its whiftier moments (it’s normally a pretty conservative court on product liability matters) had allowed market share liability in a DES case. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 5:37 am by Susan Brenner
McCrary, 45 S.W.3d 36 (Tennessee Court of Appeals 2000); State v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:25 pm by Carter Ruml
Louisville Trust Co., 276 S.W.2d 461, 464 (Ky. 1955)  Consequently, the court found that Mr. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:25 pm by Carter Ruml
Louisville Trust Co., 276 S.W.2d 461, 464 (Ky. 1955)  Consequently, the court found that Mr. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
 The admissibility of expert testimony is a matter of law for the court, not the jury. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
 Just as in the case of proximate causation, the question of superseding intervening cause is a matter peculiarly for the jury because of foreseeability considerations. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
Haynes, 883 S.W.2d at 612 (quoting McClenahan, 806 S.W.2d at 775). [read post]