Search for: "Miller v. State of California"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 1,366
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2021, 4:48 pm
” (Citing Tinsley v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 8:34 am
The California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), the California State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS), the Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds, the Colorado Public Employees' Retirement Association, the Washington State Investment Board, five New York City pension funds, the Council of Institutional Investors (CII), and the United Kingdom-based Universities Superannuation Scheme and Hermes Equity Ownership Services all… [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm
California’s CCPA 2.0: Does the US Finally Have a Data Privacy Act? [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:14 am
Protect Niles v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 1:36 am
In Credit Suisse v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
(United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:40 am
"What the state of Texas has done in this case is imputable in law to the U.S. and engages the United States' international responsibility," she said. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:27 am
Birnbaum, Jina Choi, and Haimavatha V. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:27 am
Birnbaum, Jina Choi, and Haimavatha V. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 1:44 pm
California, 137 S. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm
United States George W. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm
* * * “In Furman v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 6:36 am
Tennesseeat LA Monroe- 4 1/234-3143-40WWJoe Craddock 22 of 29 for 401 yardsRutgersat Connecticut+324-2319-38LLRed Zone defenseis the differenceTulsaat Tulane- 6 1/240-3749-25WWTulsa offense goodbut defense weak Florida Stateat Boston College+ 6 1/230-2727-17WWNumber 2 team loses again Illinois atMinnesota- 1138-2144-17WWIllini punt only onceOregon Stateat USC+ 1520-373-24WW9 sacks by USC but no score in 2nd half Texas A&M atOklahoma+ 20 1/214-4414-42WWSam Bradfordthrows for 5 TDs South… [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 2:07 pm
Miller, 307 U.S. 174, 180 (1939) (citing 1 H. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 1:29 am
Developments PTY Limited v Mccreight [2024] SADC 149. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 11:39 am
Justice Samuel Miller, who wrote for the Court, never liked the Privileges or Immunities Clause. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Miller, No. 06-11078 A conviction for tax evasion is affirmed where: 1) sufficient evidence supported the jury's verdict; 2) there was no abuse of discretion in various evidentiary rulings by the district court; 3) a claim the indictment was duplicitous failed as defendant was not prejudiced; and 4) a Brady claim failed as the cumulative effect of the suppressed evidence at issue did not undermine confidence in the verdict. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 11:00 am
Laura Coordes, Harrington v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
In my view, federal courts are unduly sensitive to claims of prior restraint while states like California and Ohio have been more inclined to balance the various interests in these disputes. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:08 am
Miller. [read post]
